ArticleCurrent microbiology2018
Implementing Electric Potential Difference as a New Practical Parameter for Rapid and Specific Measurement of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics.
Article in Current microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New methods to determine antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial pathogens especially the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotics have great importance in pharmaceutical industry and treatment procedures. In the present study, the MIC of several antibiotics was determined against some pathogenic bacteria using macrodilution test. In order to accelerate and increase the efficiency of culture-based method to determine antimicrobial susceptibility, the possible relationship between the changes in some physico-chemical parameters including conductivity, electrical potential difference (EPD), pH and total number of test strains was investigated during the logarithmic phase of bacterial growth in presence of antibiotics. The correlation between changes in these physico-chemical parameters and growth of bacteria was statistically evaluated using linear and non-linear regression models. Finally, the calculated MIC values in new proposed method were compared with the MIC derived from macrodilution test. The results represent significant association between the changes in EPD and pH values and growth of the tested bacteria during the exponential phase of bacterial growth. It has been assumed that the proliferation of bacteria can cause the significant changes in EPD values. The MIC values in both conventional and new method were consistent to each other. In conclusion, cost and time effective antimicrobial susceptibility test can be developed based on monitoring the changes in EPD values. The new proposed strategy also can be used in high throughput screening of biocompounds for their antimicrobial activity in a relatively shorter time (6-8 h) in comparison with the conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29869678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.