Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29869322›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2018

Do all the European surgeons perform the same D2? The need of D2 audit in Europe.

Maria Bencivenga, Giuseppe Verlato, Valentina Mengardo, Jacopo Weindelmayer, William H Allum

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06466902 (Evaluation of Intra-operative Photographs for the Assessment of a Proper Lymphadenectomy in Minimally-invasive Gastric Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06466902 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Intra-operative Photographs for the Assessment of a Proper Lymphadenectomy in Minimally-invasive Gastric Cancer Surgery (PhotoNodes)

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ParmaRan2022 to 2027Enrolled326ConditionsGastric Cancer, Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Lymphadenectomy, Minimally Invasive SurgeryArmsQuality assessment of D2 lymphadenectomy using the PhotoNode Score
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria BencivengaGeneral and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy. mariabenci@hotmail.it.
Giuseppe VerlatoUnit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Valentina MengardoGeneral and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Jacopo WeindelmayerGeneral and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
William H AllumDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard of care for radical intent surgical treatment of gastric cancer, the real compliance with D2 dissection in Europe is still unknown. The aim of the present study is to analyze the variation in lymph-node harvesting reported after D2 dissection in European series and to present a European project aiming at evaluating the real compliance with D2 lymphadenectomy. A PubMed search for papers using the key words "D2 lymphadenectomy" and "gastric cancer" from 2008 to 2017 was undertaken. Only studies by European authors in English language reporting the number of retrieved lymph nodes after D2 lymphadenectomy were included. The results of literature review were descriptively reported. The literature survey yielded 16 studies: 2 RCTs, 3 observational multicentre studies, and 11 observational monocentric studies. A large variability was found in the number of retrieved nodes, which, overall, was the lowest in the surgical series from Eastern Europe (16.6 and 19.9 in the Lithuanian and Hungarian series, respectively) and the highest in an Italian RCT. The within-study variability was also quite high, especially in multicentre RCTs and observational studies. Sample size tended to have a larger effect on the variability of lymph nodes retrieved than on its actual value. However, in both cases, the relation was not significant, due to the low number of studies considered. There is a large variability in the number of retrieved nodes after D2 dissection in European series. This reflects, at least partly, different approaches to D2 lymphadenectomy by European surgeons and may be responsible of the different outcomes observed in patients with gastric cancer across Europe. Therefore, there is the need to standardize the practice of D2 gastrectomy in Europe and to define possible variations of D2 procedures according to tumour's characteristics.

Indexed as

EuropeGuideline AdherenceHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionPractice Guidelines as TopicStomachStomach NeoplasmsSurgeonsD2 lymphadenctomyRetrieved lymph nodesStandardization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.