ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018
Pharmacist-led medication assessment and deprescribing intervention for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy: a pilot study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06771999 (Attitudes Towards Deprescribing of Non-oncologic Medication in Cancer Pacient and the Impact of an Educational Intervention by a Clinical Pharmacist), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Attitudes Towards Deprescribing of Non-oncologic Medication in Cancer Pacient and the Impact of an Educational Intervention by a Clinical Pharmacist
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Outcomes of deprescribing for people with life-limiting conditions: A systematic review.Palliative medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Interventions to Evaluate and Reduce Healthcare Costs of Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions among the Older Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Outcomes of deprescribing interventions in older patients with life-limiting illness and limited life expectancy: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Impact of Pharmacist-Led Polypharmacy Management on Prescribing Patterns in Older Inpatients: A Real-World Study in a Chronic Care Hospital.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Polypharmacy, Medicine Optimisation, and Medication Adherence in Older Cancer Patients.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Barriers and facilitators of deprescribing for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2026Article
- Awakening antitumour immunity in the multimorbid host: a hypothesis coupling cryoablation-induced immunogenic cell death with multi-target Traditional Chinese Medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Clinical Pharmacist and Clinical Nurse Specialist led medicine optimisation and medication adherence via eArly identifiCation advanCed gEriatric aSsesSment (ACCESS) tool in Senior Adult Oncology Programme (SAOP).International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Pharmacist-led deprescribing interventions for cancer patients in a specialist palliative care setting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Pharmacists' attitudes towards interprofessional collaboration to optimise medication use in older patients in Switzerland: a survey study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Polypharmacy and drug interactions in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: associated factors.BMC geriatrics · 2024Observational
- Decreasing polypharmacy in older adults with cancer: A pilot cluster-randomized trial protocol.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2024Article
- Prescribing and deprescribing in older people with life-limiting illnesses receiving hospice care at the end of life: A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study.Palliative medicine · 2024Article
- The role of pharmacists in deprescribing benzodiazepines: A scoping review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Consultation-Based Deprescribing Service to Optimize Palliative Care for Terminal Cancer Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Emotional barriers and facilitators of deprescribing for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of countermeasure for polypharmacy by multidisciplinary team review in patients with diabetes mellitus.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2023Observational
- Associated Factors to Efficacy and Tolerance of Immunotherapy in Older Patients with Cancer Aged 70 Years and Over: Impact of Coprescriptions.Drugs & aging · 2023Article
- TOP-PIC: a new tool to optimize pharmacotherapy and reduce polypharmacy in patients with incurable cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aims of this study were to compare the application of three geriatric medication screening tools to the Beers Criteria alone for potentially inappropriate medication quantification and to determine feasibility of a pharmacist-led polypharmacy assessment in a geriatric oncology clinic.
methodsAdult patients with cancer aged 65 and older underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment. A polypharmacy assessment was completed by a pharmacist and included a review of all drug therapies. Potentially inappropriate medications were screened using the Beers Criteria, Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment/Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions, and the Medication Appropriateness Index. Deprescribing occurred after discussion with the pharmacist, geriatric oncologist, patient, and caregiver.
resultsData were collected for 26 patients. The mean number of medications was 12. The Beers Criteria alone identified 38 potentially inappropriate medications compared to 119 potentially inappropriate medications with the three-tool assessment; a mean of 5 potentially inappropriate medications were identified per patient. After the application of the three-tool assessment, 73% of potentially inappropriate medications identified were deprescribed, resulting in a mean of 3 medications deprescribed per patient. Approximately two thirds of patients reported a reduction in symptoms after the deprescribing intervention. Healthcare expenditures of $4282.27 per patient were potentially avoided as a result of deprescribing.
conclusionsOur three-tool assessment identified three times more potentially inappropriate medications than the Beers Criteria alone. Pharmacist-led deprescribing interventions are feasible and may lead to improved patient outcomes and cost savings. This three-tool assessment process should be incorporated into interdisciplinary assessments of older patients with cancer and validated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.