Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29869294›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Pharmacist-led medication assessment and deprescribing intervention for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy: a pilot study.

Andrew Whitman, Kathlene DeGregory, Amy Morris, Supriya Mohile, Erika Ramsdale

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06771999 (Attitudes Towards Deprescribing of Non-oncologic Medication in Cancer Pacient and the Impact of an Educational Intervention by a Clinical Pharmacist), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06771999 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Attitudes Towards Deprescribing of Non-oncologic Medication in Cancer Pacient and the Impact of an Educational Intervention by a Clinical Pharmacist

TypeinterventionalSponsorIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyRan2025 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsPalliative Care, CancerArmsEducational intervention by a clinical pharmacist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacist-led deprescribing interventions for cancer patients in a specialist palliative care setting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The role of pharmacists in deprescribing benzodiazepines: A scoping review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Emotional barriers and facilitators of deprescribing for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew WhitmanDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Amw6az@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1646-0699
Kathlene DeGregoryDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Amy MorrisDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Supriya MohileDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Erika RamsdaleDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Cancer Control Research Training Curriculum (R25T)R25CA102618 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI JANELSINS, MICHELLE C, MORROW, GARY R · 2004 to 2018
$6.7M
A Patient-Oriented Research Program in Geriatric OncologyK24AG056589 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Supriya G. Mohile · 2018 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA102618NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aims of this study were to compare the application of three geriatric medication screening tools to the Beers Criteria alone for potentially inappropriate medication quantification and to determine feasibility of a pharmacist-led polypharmacy assessment in a geriatric oncology clinic.

methodsAdult patients with cancer aged 65 and older underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment. A polypharmacy assessment was completed by a pharmacist and included a review of all drug therapies. Potentially inappropriate medications were screened using the Beers Criteria, Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment/Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions, and the Medication Appropriateness Index. Deprescribing occurred after discussion with the pharmacist, geriatric oncologist, patient, and caregiver.

resultsData were collected for 26 patients. The mean number of medications was 12. The Beers Criteria alone identified 38 potentially inappropriate medications compared to 119 potentially inappropriate medications with the three-tool assessment; a mean of 5 potentially inappropriate medications were identified per patient. After the application of the three-tool assessment, 73% of potentially inappropriate medications identified were deprescribed, resulting in a mean of 3 medications deprescribed per patient. Approximately two thirds of patients reported a reduction in symptoms after the deprescribing intervention. Healthcare expenditures of $4282.27 per patient were potentially avoided as a result of deprescribing.

conclusionsOur three-tool assessment identified three times more potentially inappropriate medications than the Beers Criteria alone. Pharmacist-led deprescribing interventions are feasible and may lead to improved patient outcomes and cost savings. This three-tool assessment process should be incorporated into interdisciplinary assessments of older patients with cancer and validated in future studies.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overDeprescriptionsFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleNeoplasmsPharmacistsPilot ProjectsPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListDeprescribingGeriatric oncologyPolypharmacyPotentially inappropriate medications

Identifiers

PMID29869294
PMCPMC6204077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.