Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29869226›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2018

Role of DCE-MR in predicting breast cancer subtypes.

Marco Macchini, Martina Ponziani, Andrea Prochowski Iamurri, Mirco Pistelli, Mariagrazia De Lisa, Rossana Berardi, Gian Marco Giuseppetti

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco MacchiniSc. Spec. Radiologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. marcomacchini@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7338-6261
Martina PonzianiSc. Spec. Radiologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Andrea Prochowski IamurriDiSCO, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Mirco PistelliAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Clinica di Oncologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Mariagrazia De LisaAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Clinica di Oncologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Rossana BerardiAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Clinica di Oncologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Gian Marco GiuseppettiAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Clinica di Radiologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this retrospective study is to find a correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MR features with histological, immunohistochemical and loco-regional characteristics of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 149 patients with histopathologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma underwent MR imaging. Histological analysis included: histological features (histological type, necrosis, vascular invasion and Mib-1), immunohistochemical characterization (immunophenotype, receptor status, HER2-neu and grading) and loco-regional characteristics (T and N). The kinetic MR features analyzed were: curve type, maximum enhancement, time to peak, wash-in and wash-out rate, brevity of enhancement and area under curve.

resultsMRI kinetic parameters and immunohistological features were compared using chi square test, two-tailed student t test and Anova test, with p = 0.05 level of significance. Vascular invasion was shown to be significantly related to time to peak (p = 0.02). The immunohistotype was shown to be significantly related with maximum enhancement (p = 0.05), time to peak (p = 0.04) and wash-in rate (p = 0.01). ER status correlates with maximum and relative enhancement (p = 0.004 and p = 0.028), wash-in rate (p = 0.0018) and area under curve (p = 0.006). PR status was significantly related to time to peak (p = 0.048) and wash-in rate (p = 0.05).

conclusionMaximum enhancement absolute and relative, time to peak, wash-in rate and area under the curve significantly correlate with several prognostic factors, like ER status, immune profile and tumoral vascular invasion, and may predict the aggressiveness of the tumor.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaBreast cancerBreast cancer subtypesBreast MRIMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID29869226
OpenAlexW2805575727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.