Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29869080›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

The role of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct disruption in patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

Mateusz Jagielski, Marian Smoczyński, Krystian Adrych

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Percutaneous Biopsy and Drainage of the Pancreas.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Endoscopic treatment of pancreaticopleural fistulas.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mateusz JagielskiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Gdansk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214, Gdansk, Poland. matjagiel@gmail.com.
Marian SmoczyńskiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Gdansk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214, Gdansk, Poland.
Krystian AdrychDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Gdansk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214, Gdansk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe place of endoscopic techniques in the treatment of main pancreatic duct (MPD) disruption arising in the course of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to describe the findings of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) in patients with walled-off necrosis (WON). It was attempted to evaluate the role of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct disruption in patients with WON.

methodsThe retrospective analysis of results and complications with particular emphasis to all ERP procedures in the group of 226 patients was conducted, which underwent endoscopic treatment of symptomatic WON between years 2001 and 2016 in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of Medical University of Gdańsk.

resultsERP was performed in 204/226 (90.27%) patients. Partial and complete disruption of the MPD were identified in 103 (50.49%) and 63 (30.89%) out of 204 patients, respectively. Endoscopic treatment was used in all 166 patients with MPD disruption. The success of endoscopic treatment of MPD disruption was achieved in 138/161 (85.71%) patients with WON. The therapeutic success of WON endotherapy was achieved in 214/226 (94.69%) patients. The mean follow-up duration was 56 (SD = 37.06) [range 14-158] months. Long-term success of treatment of WON was achieved in 182/226 (80.53%) patients.

conclusionsMPD disruption occurs in the majority of patients with WON. Partial disruption of the MPD is more frequent than complete disruption of the duct. This study conducted on a large group of patients demonstrated that prosthesis insertion into the MPD in patients with disruption of the MPD in the course of ANP is one of the key elements in endoscopic treatment of WON. Passive transpapillary drainage is an effective method of treating MPD disruptions, which improves long-term outcomes of endoscopic treatment in patients with WON.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDrainageFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic DuctsPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingRetrospective StudiesSphincterotomy, EndoscopicSurgery, Computer-AssistedAcute pancreatitisEndoscopic drainageEndoscopic retrograde pancreatographyPancreatic duct disruptionWalled-off pancreatic necrosis

Identifiers

PMID29869080
OpenAlexW2806754811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.