Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2018
Effect of Increased Inpatient Attending Physician Supervision on Medical Errors, Patient Safety, and Resident Education: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03318198 (The Effect of Intensive Inpatient Attending Supervision on Medical Errors, Patient Safety and Resident Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Intensive Inpatient Attending Supervision on Medical Errors, Patient Safety and Resident Education
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing ward rounds: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to enhance patient safety.The British journal of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Firsthand Accounts of Practicing Generalists-Internal Medicine Residency and the 'Leap of Faith' into Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Loma Linda University Health clinicians' beliefs, knowledge and experiences regarding pain management.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Handing Over the Wheel to the Residents: Navigating Autonomy and Patient Safety.Indian pediatrics · 2026Review
- Online case-based learning to enhance pediatric endocrinology resident education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- From algorithms to operating room: can large language models master China's attending anesthesiology exam? A cross-sectional evaluation.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Enhancing clinical faculties' knowledge, attitudes, and performance in clinical supervision: a workplace-based faculty development program using proctor's model.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Trainee Autonomy and Supervision in the Inpatient Clinical Learning Environment.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Click to consult: psychiatrists' perspectives on how telepsychiatry impacts communication in the emergency department.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Medical education and physician training in the era of artificial intelligence.Singapore medical journal · 2024Article
- Training Cerebrovascular and Neuroendovascular Surgery Residents: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations.Ochsner journal · 2024Review
- Patient Surgical Outcomes When Surgery Residents Are the Primary Surgeon by Intensity of Surgical Attending Supervision in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023Article
- Micromanagement in clinical supervision: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Association between patient care ownership and personal or environmental factors among medical trainees: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Individual and residency program factors related to depression, anxiety and burnout in physician residents - a Brazilian survey.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Review
- Essentials of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine fellowship: an overview.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Review
- Barriers to Accessing Nighttime Supervisors: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Residents.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- The impact of COVID-19 on clinical education of internal medicine trainees.Irish journal of medical science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: While the relationship between resident work hours and patient safety has been extensively studied, little research has evaluated the role of attending physician supervision on patient safety. Objective: To determine the effect of increased attending physician supervision on an inpatient resident general medical service on patient safety and educational outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 9-month randomized clinical trial performed on an inpatient general medical service of a large academic medical center used a crossover design. Participants were clinical teaching attending physicians and residents in an internal medicine residency program. Interventions: Twenty-two faculty provided either (1) increased direct supervision in which attending physicians joined work rounds on previously admitted patients or (2) standard supervision in which attending physicians were available but did not join work rounds. Each faculty member participated in both arms in random order. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary safety outcome was rate of medical errors. Resident education was evaluated via a time-motion study to assess resident participation on rounds and via surveys to measure resident and attending physician educational ratings. Results: Of the 22 attending physicians, 8 (36%) were women, with 15 (68%) having more than 5 years of experience. A total of 1259 patients (5772 patient-days) were included in the analysis. The medical error rate was not significantly different between standard vs increased supervision (107.6; 95% CI, 85.8-133.7 vs 91.1; 95% CI, 76.9-104.0 per 1000 patient-days; P = .21). Time-motion analysis of 161 work rounds found no difference in mean length of time spent discussing established patients in the 2 models (202; 95% CI, 192-212 vs 202; 95% CI, 189-215 minutes; P = .99). Interns spoke less when an attending physician joined rounds (64; 95% CI, 60-68 vs 55; 95% CI, 49-60 minutes; P = .008). In surveys, interns reported feeling less efficient (41 [55%] vs 68 [73%]; P = .02) and less autonomous (53 [72%] vs 86 [91%]; P = .001) with an attending physician present and residents felt less autonomous (11 [58%] vs 30 [97%]; P < .001). Conversely, attending physicians rated the quality of care higher when they participated on work rounds (20 [100%] vs 16 [80%]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: Increased direct attending physician supervision did not significantly reduce the medical error rate. In designing morning work rounds, residency programs should reconsider their balance of patient safety, learning needs, and resident autonomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03318198.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.