Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29868832›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Transfer learning for biomedical named entity recognition with neural networks.

John M Giorgi, Gary D Bader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Assigning species information to corresponding genes by a sequence labeling framework.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How Do Your Biomedical Named Entity Recognition Models Generalize to Novel Entities?IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John M GiorgiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Gary D BaderDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Pathway Commons: Research Resource for Biological PathwaysU41HG006623 · NHGRI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SANDER, CHRIS · 2012 to 2017
$5.7M
Cytoscape: A Modeling Platform for Biomolecular NetworksR01GM070743 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2004 to 2016
$5.7M
Cytoscape: A Modeling Platform for Biomolecular NetworksR01HG009979 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009979NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG006623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: The explosive increase of biomedical literature has made information extraction an increasingly important tool for biomedical research. A fundamental task is the recognition of biomedical named entities in text (BNER) such as genes/proteins, diseases and species. Recently, a domain-independent method based on deep learning and statistical word embeddings, called long short-term memory network-conditional random field (LSTM-CRF), has been shown to outperform state-of-the-art entity-specific BNER tools. However, this method is dependent on gold-standard corpora (GSCs) consisting of hand-labeled entities, which tend to be small but highly reliable. An alternative to GSCs are silver-standard corpora (SSCs), which are generated by harmonizing the annotations made by several automatic annotation systems. SSCs typically contain more noise than GSCs but have the advantage of containing many more training examples. Ideally, these corpora could be combined to achieve the benefits of both, which is an opportunity for transfer learning. In this work, we analyze to what extent transfer learning improves upon state-of-the-art results for BNER. Results: We demonstrate that transferring a deep neural network (DNN) trained on a large, noisy SSC to a smaller, but more reliable GSC significantly improves upon state-of-the-art results for BNER. Compared to a state-of-the-art baseline evaluated on 23 GSCs covering four different entity classes, transfer learning results in an average reduction in error of approximately 11%. We found transfer learning to be especially beneficial for target datasets with a small number of labels (approximately 6000 or less). Availability and implementation: Source code for the LSTM-CRF is available at https://github.com/Franck-Dernoncourt/NeuroNER/ and links to the corpora are available at https://github.com/BaderLab/Transfer-Learning-BNER-Bioinformatics-2018/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Deep LearningInformation Storage and RetrievalNeural Networks, ComputerSoftwareComputational Biology

Identifiers

PMID29868832
PMCPMC6247938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.