ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Transfer learning for biomedical named entity recognition with neural networks.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging artificial intelligence and biological sciences: a comprehensive review of large language models in bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- GRU-SCANET: unleashing the power of GRU-based sinusoidal capture network for precision-driven named entity recognition.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Synchronous Mutual Learning Network and Asynchronous Multi-Scale Embedding Network for miRNA-Disease Association Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
- Natural language processing (NLP) to facilitate abstract review in medical research: the application of BioBERT to exploring the 20-year use of NLP in medical research.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Transfer learning-based English translation text classification in a multimedia network environment.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- S1000: a better taxonomic name corpus for biomedical information extraction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- OpticalBERT and OpticalTable-SQA: Text- and Table-Based Language Models for the Optical-Materials Domain.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Review: A Roadmap to Use Nonstructured Data to Discover Multitarget Cancer Therapies.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Review
- Assigning species information to corresponding genes by a sequence labeling framework.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- A comparative study of pre-trained language models for named entity recognition in clinical trial eligibility criteria from multiple corpora.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- A machine learning framework for discovery and enrichment of metagenomics metadata from open access publications.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters identification based on residual network transfer learning.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2022Article
- Benchmarking for biomedical natural language processing tasks with a domain specific ALBERT.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Hierarchical shared transfer learning for biomedical named entity recognition.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- How Do Your Biomedical Named Entity Recognition Models Generalize to Novel Entities?IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2022Article
- Transfer learning: a friendly introduction.Journal of big data · 2022Article
- Multi-task learning for Chinese clinical named entity recognition with external knowledge.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Improving deep learning method for biomedical named entity recognition by using entity definition information.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Analyzing transfer learning impact in biomedical cross-lingual named entity recognition and normalization.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: The explosive increase of biomedical literature has made information extraction an increasingly important tool for biomedical research. A fundamental task is the recognition of biomedical named entities in text (BNER) such as genes/proteins, diseases and species. Recently, a domain-independent method based on deep learning and statistical word embeddings, called long short-term memory network-conditional random field (LSTM-CRF), has been shown to outperform state-of-the-art entity-specific BNER tools. However, this method is dependent on gold-standard corpora (GSCs) consisting of hand-labeled entities, which tend to be small but highly reliable. An alternative to GSCs are silver-standard corpora (SSCs), which are generated by harmonizing the annotations made by several automatic annotation systems. SSCs typically contain more noise than GSCs but have the advantage of containing many more training examples. Ideally, these corpora could be combined to achieve the benefits of both, which is an opportunity for transfer learning. In this work, we analyze to what extent transfer learning improves upon state-of-the-art results for BNER. Results: We demonstrate that transferring a deep neural network (DNN) trained on a large, noisy SSC to a smaller, but more reliable GSC significantly improves upon state-of-the-art results for BNER. Compared to a state-of-the-art baseline evaluated on 23 GSCs covering four different entity classes, transfer learning results in an average reduction in error of approximately 11%. We found transfer learning to be especially beneficial for target datasets with a small number of labels (approximately 6000 or less). Availability and implementation: Source code for the LSTM-CRF is available at https://github.com/Franck-Dernoncourt/NeuroNER/ and links to the corpora are available at https://github.com/BaderLab/Transfer-Learning-BNER-Bioinformatics-2018/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.