Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29868784›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of epidemiology2018

Associations of Biomarker-Calibrated Intake of Total Sugars With the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Natasha Tasevska, Mary Pettinger, Victor Kipnis, Douglas Midthune, Lesley F Tinker, Nancy Potischman, Marian L Neuhouser, Jeannette M Beasley, Linda Van Horn, Barbara V Howard and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Establishing 24-Hour Urinary Sucrose Plus Fructose as a Predictive Biomarker for Total Sugars Intake.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha TasevskaSchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.
Mary PettingerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Victor KipnisDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Douglas MidthuneDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Lesley F TinkerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Nancy PotischmanPopulation Studies Program, National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, Bethesda, Maryland.
Marian L NeuhouserDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Jeannette M BeasleyDivision of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Linda Van HornDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Barbara V HowardMedstar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland.
Simin LiuBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
JoAnn E MansonBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
James M ShikanyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Cynthia A ThomsonDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Ross L PrenticeDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USArizona State University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USBrown University · USMedStar Health · USNational Institutes of Health · USNew York University · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Kirk Michael Habegger · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment Study (NPAAS)R01CA119171 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian L Neuhouser · 2006 to 2026
$14.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA119171NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100046CNIA NIH HHS HHSN271201100004CNIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626WHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inconsistent findings from epidemiologic studies relating total sugars (TS) consumption to cardiovascular disease (CVD) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk may be partly due to measurement error in self-reported intake. Using regression calibration equations developed based on the predictive biomarker for TS and recovery biomarker for energy, we examined the association of TS with T2D and CVD risk, before and after dietary calibration, in 82,254 postmenopausal women participating in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. After up to 16 years of follow-up (1993-2010), 6,621 T2D and 5,802 CVD incident cases were identified. The hazard ratio for T2D per 20% increase in calibrated TS was 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77, 1.15) in multivariable energy substitution, and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.18) in energy partition models. Multivariable hazard ratios for total CVD were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.09) from energy substitution, and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.04) from energy partition models. Uncalibrated TS generated a statistically significant inverse association with T2D and total CVD risk in multivariable energy substitution and energy partition models. The lack of conclusive findings from our calibrated analyses may be due to the low explanatory power of the calibration equations for TS, which could have led to incomplete deattenuation of the risk estimates.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCalibrationCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietDietary SugarsDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostmenopauseProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkersDietary Sugars

Identifiers

PMID29868784
PMCPMC6166207
OpenAlexW2807441920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.