ReviewFrontiers in medicine2018
Improving Perioperative Outcomes Through Minimally Invasive and Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring Techniques.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remimazolam provides better hemodynamic stability than propofol in hypertensive surgical patients: a randomized single-blinded trial.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Trial
- Article
- Continuous Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cirrhotic Patients-Friend or Foe?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Management of gastrointestinal bleed in the intensive care setting, an updated literature review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Intraoperative Beat-to-Beat Pulse Transit Time (PTT) Monitoring via Non-Invasive Piezoelectric/Piezocapacitive Peripheral Sensors Can Predict Changes in Invasively Acquired Blood Pressure in High-Risk Surgical Patients.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Remote Patient-Monitoring System for Intensive Care Medicine: Mixed Methods Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Imputation of the continuous arterial line blood pressure waveform from non-invasive measurements using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Does electroencephalographic burst suppression still play a role in the perioperative setting?Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · 2021Review
- Interventions to improve perioperative neurologic outcomes.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2020Review
- Seen and Ignored: Are We Undermining Studies of Brain Health Interventions Before We Start?Anesthesia and analgesia · 2020Article
- Noninvasive Monitoring and Potential for Patient Outcome.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2019Review
- Comparison of two continuous non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring techniques in the perioperative setting.Acta medica Lituanic · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increasing number of patients require precise intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring due to aging and comorbidities. To prevent undesirable outcomes from intraoperative hypotension or hypoperfusion, appropriate threshold settings are required. These setting can vary widely from patient to patient. Goal-directed therapy techniques allow for flow monitoring as the standard for perioperative fluid management. Based on the concept of personalized medicine, individual assessment and treatment are more advantageous than conventional or uniform interventions. The recent development of minimally and noninvasive monitoring devices make it possible to apply detailed control, tracking, and observation of broad patient populations, all while reducing adverse complications. In this manuscript, we review the monitoring features of each device, together with possible advantages and disadvantages of their use in optimizing patient hemodynamic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.