Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29868595›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2018

Impact of an 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiotracer Injection Infiltration on Patient Management-A Case Report.

Jackson W Kiser, James R Crowley, David A Wyatt, Ronald K Lattanze

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Long axial field-of-view PET imaging of intraarterial 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intramuscular [Viruses · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection of Excess Presence ofFrontiers in medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Correction of Positron Emission Tomography Maximum Intensity Projection Image Artifact Using Retro Reconstruction Method.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jackson W KiserCarilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, United States.
James R CrowleyCarilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, United States.
David A WyattCarilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Ronald K LattanzeLucerno Dynamics, Cary, NC, United States.
Carilion Clinic · USLucerno Dynamics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major management decisions in patients with solid tumors and lymphomas are often based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT. The misadministration of 18F-FDG outside the systemic circulation can have an adverse impact on this test's sensitivity (1) and is not uncommon (2-7). This report describes how an 18F-FDG misadministration led to a repeat PET/CT study, resulting in the visualization of distant metastases that changed the original treatment plan. The findings suggest that routine injection monitoring is indicated whenever sensitivity is critical, and support claims that infiltrations can confound interpretation of semi-quantitative PET outcome measures in patients who are followed longitudinally (2).

Indexed as

extravasation of diagnostic and therapeutic materialsFDGPET-CTSUVtime activity curve

Identifiers

PMID29868595
PMCPMC5962786
OpenAlexW2802800738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.