Article3 Biotech2018
Microbial degradation of
Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of a putative metal-dependent PTP-like phosphatase from Lactobacillus helveticus 2126.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024Article
- The implication of viability and pathogenicity by truncated lipopolysaccharide in Yersinia enterocolitica.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Protein composition and nutritional aspects of pea protein fractions obtained by a modified isoelectric precipitation method using fermentation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Probiotic Validation of a Non-native, Thermostable, Phytase-Producing Bacterium: Streptococcus thermophilus.Current microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- A Preliminary Study on Probiotic Characteristics of Sporosarcina spp. for Poultry Applications.Current microbiology · 2019Article
- Lactic Fermentation as a Strategy to Improve the Nutritional and Functional Values of Pseudocereals.Frontiers in nutrition · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial degradation of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.