Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29868139›Full record

ArticleMaedica2018

The Safety and Efficacy of Clipless versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - our Experience in an Indian Rural Center.

Rikki Singal, Abhishek Sharma, Muzzafar Zaman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05555810 (Suture Ligation Versus Clipping of Cystic Duct and Artery During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy . " A Prospective Comparative Study"), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05555810 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Suture Ligation Versus Clipping of Cystic Duct and Artery During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy . " A Prospective Comparative Study"

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsLaparoscopic CholecystectomyArmsclipping or ligation of the cystic duct and the cystic artery in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clip as Nidus for Choledocholithiasis after Cholecystectomy-Literature Review.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rikki SingalDepartment of Surgery, M.M. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana (Distt-Ambala), Haryana, India.
Abhishek SharmaDepartment of Surgery, M.M. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana (Distt-Ambala), Haryana, India.
Muzzafar ZamanDepartment of Surgery, M.M. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana (Distt-Ambala), Haryana, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgeries performed nowadays. There are lot of advances in closure of cystic duct and artery (clip ligation, suture ligation), but it remains an enigma regarding efficacy, safety and postoperative complications for using non-absorbable suture material or Liga clip for the operating surgeon in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

objectivesOur study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and complications of non-absorbable sutures ligation versus clips application in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and to compare the operative time and cost effectiveness of the two surgical approaches in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

methodsThis prospective study was performed between August 2014 and February 2015 in M. M. Institute of Medical Science and Research, in a rural center, Mullana, India. The study included 160 patients who were diagnosed with chronic cholecystitis in a single unit. Subjects were divided into two groups and all cases were operated by a single surgeon. The cystic pedicle was tied with non-absorbable material (silk 2-0) in group A and with Titanium clips using a clip applicator in group B.

resultsThe application of silk and clips for cystic duct and artery ligation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely used. The mean time for ligation of cystic duct was 2.50 (SD ±0.25) in group A and 1.50 min (SD ±1.85) in group B, with P<0.001, which was significant. Similarly, the mean time for ligation of cystic artery was 1.50 min (SD±0.20) in group A and 1.36 min (SD ±0.11) in group B, with P>0.001. There were no postoperative complications, such as wound infection or bile leakage, in any of the two methods. The cost of material for silk suture (40-60 Rupees or 0.62-0.92 $) is definitely much lower than that for Liga clips (790-1000 Rupees or 12.28-15.55 $). For the use of clips, a clip applicator is required, but in case of silk ligation no special instrument is required and silk is also easily available.

conclusionIn laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ligation of cystic duct and cystic artery with clips takes less time than by silk suture. We conclude that both ligation techniques can be safely and effectively used. Training for junior surgeons is necessary to avoid potential complications.

Identifiers

PMID29868139
PMCPMC5972786
OpenAlexW2803218310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.