ArticleMaedica2018
The Safety and Efficacy of Clipless versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - our Experience in an Indian Rural Center.
Article in Maedica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05555810 (Suture Ligation Versus Clipping of Cystic Duct and Artery During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy . " A Prospective Comparative Study"), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Suture Ligation Versus Clipping of Cystic Duct and Artery During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy . " A Prospective Comparative Study"
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Review
- Gastric Staple Line Reinforcement With Ligation Clips for Hemostasis in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Cureus · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic Surgery with Concomitant Hernia Repair and Cholecystectomy: An Alternative Approach to Everyday Practice.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Systematic review of cystic duct closure techniques in relation to prevention of bile duct leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2018Article
- Clip as Nidus for Choledocholithiasis after Cholecystectomy-Literature Review.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgeries performed nowadays. There are lot of advances in closure of cystic duct and artery (clip ligation, suture ligation), but it remains an enigma regarding efficacy, safety and postoperative complications for using non-absorbable suture material or Liga clip for the operating surgeon in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
objectivesOur study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and complications of non-absorbable sutures ligation versus clips application in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and to compare the operative time and cost effectiveness of the two surgical approaches in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
methodsThis prospective study was performed between August 2014 and February 2015 in M. M. Institute of Medical Science and Research, in a rural center, Mullana, India. The study included 160 patients who were diagnosed with chronic cholecystitis in a single unit. Subjects were divided into two groups and all cases were operated by a single surgeon. The cystic pedicle was tied with non-absorbable material (silk 2-0) in group A and with Titanium clips using a clip applicator in group B.
resultsThe application of silk and clips for cystic duct and artery ligation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely used. The mean time for ligation of cystic duct was 2.50 (SD ±0.25) in group A and 1.50 min (SD ±1.85) in group B, with P<0.001, which was significant. Similarly, the mean time for ligation of cystic artery was 1.50 min (SD±0.20) in group A and 1.36 min (SD ±0.11) in group B, with P>0.001. There were no postoperative complications, such as wound infection or bile leakage, in any of the two methods. The cost of material for silk suture (40-60 Rupees or 0.62-0.92 $) is definitely much lower than that for Liga clips (790-1000 Rupees or 12.28-15.55 $). For the use of clips, a clip applicator is required, but in case of silk ligation no special instrument is required and silk is also easily available.
conclusionIn laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ligation of cystic duct and cystic artery with clips takes less time than by silk suture. We conclude that both ligation techniques can be safely and effectively used. Training for junior surgeons is necessary to avoid potential complications.
Identifiers
29868139PMC5972786W2803218310What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.