Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29868072›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2018

The Challenge of Analyzing the Sugarcane Genome.

Prathima P Thirugnanasambandam, Nam V Hoang, Robert J Henry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. SsPit2A/B Effectors fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cell wall modulation by drought and elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent Advances in Assembly of Complex Plant Genomes.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prathima P ThirugnanasambandamQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Nam V HoangCollege of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Hue, Vietnam.
Robert J HenryQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference genome sequences have become key platforms for genetics and breeding of the major crop species. Sugarcane is probably the largest crop produced in the world (in weight of crop harvested) but lacks a reference genome sequence. Sugarcane has one of the most complex genomes in crop plants due to the extreme level of polyploidy. The genome of modern sugarcane hybrids includes sub-genomes from two progenitors

Indexed as

comparative genomicsgenome sequencinggenome translatingpolyploid genomeprogenitors speciessugarcane genomesugarcane sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29868072
PMCPMC5961476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.