ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018
Leveraging the Use of Historical Data Gathered During Seed Regeneration of an
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wheat historical phenotypic data from European genebanks as an important resource for research and breeding.Scientific data · 2026Article
- GermVersity: A free and user-friendly interface to enhance the visualization and analysis of genebank data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Harnessing historical genebank data to accelerate pea breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Genetic gains in IRRI's rice salinity breeding and elite panel development as a future breeding resource.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Genomic prediction reveals unexplored variation in grain protein and lysine content across a vast winter wheat genebank collection.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- De novo SNP calling reveals the genetic differentiation and morphological divergence in genus Amaranthus.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Genomic prediction models trained with historical records enable populating the German ex situ genebank bio-digital resource center of barley (Hordeum sp.) with information on resistances to soilborne barley mosaic viruses.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Article
- Prospects forFrontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Genebank Phenomics: A Strategic Approach to Enhance Value and Utilization of Crop Germplasm.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Article
- Using Genome-Wide Predictions to Assess the Phenotypic Variation of a Barley (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Historical phenotypic data from seven decades of seed regeneration in a wheat ex situ collection.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Unbalanced historical phenotypic data from seed regeneration of a barley ex situ collection.Scientific data · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genebanks are a rich source of genetic variation. Most of this variation is absent in breeding programs but may be useful for further crop plant improvement. However, the lack of phenotypic information forms a major obstacle for the educated choice of genebank accessions for research and breeding. A promising approach to fill this information gap is to exploit historical information gathered routinely during seed regeneration cycles. Still, this data is characterized by a high non-orthogonality hampering their analysis. By examining historical data records for flowering time, plant height, and thousand grain weight collected during 70 years of regeneration of 6,207 winter wheat (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.