Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29868048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

The Mating System of the Wild-to-Domesticated Complex of

Rebeca Velázquez-López, Ana Wegier, Valeria Alavez, Javier Pérez-López, Valeria Vázquez-Barrios, Denise Arroyo-Lambaer, Alejandro Ponce-Mendoza, William E Kunin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Analysis of Floral Transcriptomes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Subgenome evolution in allotetraploid plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Changes in Reproductive Traits inFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  7. PeerJ · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebeca Velázquez-LópezLaboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ana WegierLaboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Valeria AlavezLaboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Javier Pérez-LópezLaboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Valeria Vázquez-BarriosLaboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Denise Arroyo-LambaerLaboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro Ponce-MendozaComisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico City, Mexico.
William E KuninDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestication syndrome of many plants includes changes in their mating systems. The evolution of the latter is shaped by ecological and genetic factors that are particular to an area. Thus, the reproductive biology of wild relatives must be studied in their natural distribution to understand the mating system of a crop species as a whole.

Indexed as

autogamycottoncrop wild relativesdomestication processintrogressionmating systemreproductive successxenogamy

Identifiers

PMID29868048
PMCPMC5954804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.