ArticleFrontiers in immunology2018
RepSeq Data Representativeness and Robustness Assessment by Shannon Entropy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clonal CD8 T cells link peripheral and intrathecal immunity in ALS4 progression: a multiomics reference for ALS.Research square · 2026Article
- Thymic selection of the T cell receptor repertoire is biased toward autoimmunity in females.eLife · 2026Article
- AnalyzAIRR: A user-friendly guided workflow for AIRR data analysis.Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Rigorous benchmarking of T-cell receptor repertoire profiling methods for cancer RNA sequencing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- GENTLE: a novel bioinformatics tool for generating features and building classifiers from T cell repertoire cancer data.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Biological controls for standardization and interpretation of adaptive immune receptor repertoire profiling.eLife · 2021Review
- Concepts and Applications of Information Theory to Immuno-Oncology.Trends in cancer · 2021Review
- Benchmarking of T cell receptor repertoire profiling methods reveals large systematic biases.Nature biotechnology · 2021Article
- Single-Cell Sequencing of T cell Receptors: A Perspective on the Technological Development and Translational Application.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020Review
- Preliminary analysis of spatial-temporal homogeneity and heterogeneity of TCR β chain CDR3 repertoires in BALB/c mice.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing (HTS) has the potential to decipher the diversity of T cell repertoires and their dynamics during immune responses. Applied to T cell subsets such as T effector and T regulatory cells, it should help identify novel biomarkers of diseases. However, given the extreme diversity of TCR repertoires, understanding how the sequencing conditions, including cell numbers, biological and technical sampling and sequencing depth, impact the experimental outcome is critical to proper use of these data. Here, we assessed the representativeness and robustness of TCR repertoire diversity assessment according to experimental conditions. By comparative analyses of experimental datasets and computer simulations, we found that (i) for small samples, the number of clonotypes recovered is often higher than the number of cells per sample, even after removing the singletons; (ii) high-sequencing depth for small samples alters the clonotype distributions, which can be corrected by filtering the datasets using Shannon entropy as a threshold; and (iii) a single sequencing run at high depth does not ensure a good coverage of the clonotype richness in highly polyclonal populations, which can be better covered using multiple sequencing. Altogether, our results warrant better understanding and awareness of the limitation of TCR diversity analyses by HTS and justify the development of novel computational tools for improved modeling of the highly complex nature of TCR repertoires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.