Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29867745›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2018

Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Cerebral Diseases and Neurointerventional Procedures: Recent Research Progress.

Geng Zhou, Ming Hua Li, Gabriel Tudor, Hai Tao Lu, Ramanathan Kadirvel, David Kallmes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neuroadaptive Biochemical Mechanisms of Remote Ischemic Conditioning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Geng ZhouShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ming Hua LiShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Gabriel TudorMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Hai Tao LuShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ramanathan KadirvelMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
David KallmesMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Computational and Biological Approach to Flow DiversionR01NS076491 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Juan R Cebral, DAVID F KALLMES · 2011 to 2026
$7.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral ischemia and stroke are increasing in prevalence and are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing countries. Despite the progress in endovascular treatment, ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury is an important contributor to post-surgical mortality and morbidity affecting a wide range of neurointerventional procedures. However, pharmacological recruitment of effective cerebral protective signaling has been largely disappointing to date. In remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), repetitive transient mechanical obstruction of vessels at a limb remote from the IR injury site protects vital organs from IR injury and confers infarction size reduction following prolonged arterial occlusion. Results of pharmacologic agents appear to be species specific, while RIC is based on the neuroprotective influences of phosphorylated protein kinase B, signaling proteins, nitric oxide, and transcriptional activators, the benefits of which have been confirmed in many species. Inducing RIC protection in patients undergoing cerebral vascular surgery or those who are at high risk of brain injury has been the subject of research and has been enacted in clinical settings. Its simplicity and non-invasive nature, as well as the flexibility of the timing of RIC stimulus, also makes it feasible to apply alongside neurointerventional procedures. Furthermore, despite nonuniform RIC protocols, emerging literature demonstrates improved clinical outcomes. The aims of this article are to summarize the potential mechanisms underlying different forms of conditioning, to explore the current translation of this paradigm from laboratory to neurovascular diseases, and to outline applications for patient care.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokeischemia/reperfusion injuryneurointerventional proceduresneuroprotectionremote ischemic conditioning

Identifiers

PMID29867745
PMCPMC5964135
OpenAlexW2802907242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.