Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29867649›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

'First, Do No Harm': The Role of Negative Emotions and Moral Disengagement in Understanding the Relationship Between Workplace Aggression and Misbehavior.

Roberta Fida, Carlo Tramontano, Marinella Paciello, Chiara Guglielmetti, Silvia Gilardi, Tahira M Probst, Claudio Barbaranelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Economic Model of Optimal Penalty for Health Care Workplace Violence.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberta FidaNorwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Carlo TramontanoCentre for Advances in Behavioural Science, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Marinella PacielloFaculty of Psychology, Università Telematica Internazionale Uninettuno, Rome, Italy.
Chiara GuglielmettiDipartimento di Economia, Management e Metodi Quantitativi, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Silvia GilardiDipartimento di Economia, Management e Metodi Quantitativi, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Tahira M ProbstDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, WA, United States.
Claudio BarbaranelliDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workplace aggression is a critical phenomenon particularly in the healthcare sector, where nurses are especially at risk of bullying and third-party aggression. While workplace aggression has been frequently examined in relation to health problems, less is known about the possible negative impact such aggression may have on the (un)ethical behavior of victims. Our research aims to fill this gap. Drawing on literature on counterproductive work behavior (CWB) and the social-cognitive literature on aggression we investigated in two independent studies (

Indexed as

bullyingdiscrete negative emotionshealthmisbehaviormoral disengagementworkplace aggression

Identifiers

PMID29867649
PMCPMC5958226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.