Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29867313›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Mouse Strain Affects Behavioral and Neuroendocrine Stress Responses Following Administration of Probiotic

Karen-Anne McVey Neufeld, Sebastian Kay, John Bienenstock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut microbes
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of Two Distinct Psychoactive Microbes,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen-Anne McVey NeufeldDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Sebastian KayBrain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare at McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
John BienenstockDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is keen interest in the development of alternative therapies in the treatment of depression. Given the explosion of research focused on the microbiota-gut-brain axis, consideration has turned to the potential of certain probiotics to improve patient outcomes for those suffering from mood disorders. Here we examine the abilities of a known antidepressant, fluoxetine, and the probiotic

Indexed as

antidepressantmicrobiota-gut-brain axismouse strainprobioticstress reactivity

Identifiers

PMID29867313
PMCPMC5952003
OpenAlexW2802722291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.