Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29867299›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2018

Does use of long-term care differ between occupational classes among the oldest old? Vitality 90 + Study.

Linda Enroth, Mari Aaltonen, Jani Raitanen, Lily Nosraty, Marja Jylhä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda Enroth1Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Gerontology Research Center (GEREC), University of Tampere, Arvo-Building, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6613-3154
Mari Aaltonen1Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Gerontology Research Center (GEREC), University of Tampere, Arvo-Building, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Jani Raitanen1Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Gerontology Research Center (GEREC), University of Tampere, Arvo-Building, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Lily Nosraty1Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Gerontology Research Center (GEREC), University of Tampere, Arvo-Building, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Marja Jylhä1Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Gerontology Research Center (GEREC), University of Tampere, Arvo-Building, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term care (LTC) use increases with ageing due to an age-related increase in disability. Both the levels of disability and social resources vary among socioeconomic groups. The association of socioeconomic status with LTC use is largely unexplored for the oldest old. This study examined how occupational class is associated with LTC use among nonagenarians in the context of universal care coverage. A population-based prospective cohort study with 2862 participants who answered the Vitality 90 + Study surveys in 2001, 2003, 2007, or 2010 in Tampere, Finland, was combined with national register data on LTC use. LTC use in total and separately for publicly and privately provided LTC facilities was assessed in a cross-sectional setting and during the 34-month follow-up by using logistic regression and competing-risks regression methods. Functional status, multimorbidity, family relations, and help at home were controlled. In total or public LTC use, only a few differences between occupational classes were found at baseline. However, upper non-manuals used more private LTC than lower non-manuals (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.85), skilled manuals (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62), or housewives (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.74). There were no statistically significant differences in entering any kind of LTC after adjustments for all independent variables. During the study period, the share of privately provided care out of all LTC increased and the upper non-manuals no more used private care more than other groups. This study underlines the importance of following the structural changes in LTC provision to guarantee that the need for LTC is met equally for all socioeconomic groups.

Indexed as

InstitutionalisationMortalityOldest oldSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID29867299
PMCPMC5971028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.