Mineworker fatigue: A review of what we know and future decisions.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparative Analysis of Methods of Evaluating Human Fatigue.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024
   Article
2. A Narrative Review of Health Status and Healthcare Delivery in the Oil and Gas Industry: Impacts on Employees, Employers, and Local Communities.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review
3. The human factors of mineworker fatigue: An overview on prevalence, mitigation, and what's next.American journal of industrial medicine · 2022
   Review
4. Mental health in mine workers: a literature review.Industrial health · 2021
   Review
5. When adherence to CPAP fails, how do we treat workers with obstructive sleep apnea?Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
   Article
6. Psychosocial factors associated with fatigue in mining work.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.