Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29867176›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of gastroenterology2018

Lower Relative Contribution of Positive Family History to Colorectal Cancer Risk with Increasing Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 9.28 Million Individuals.

Martin C S Wong, C H Chan, Jiayan Lin, Jason L W Huang, Junjie Huang, Yuan Fang, Wilson W L Cheung, C P Yu, John C T Wong, Gary Tse and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: From Genetic Discovery to Clinical Innovation.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2025
    Review
  9. Protective effect ofBiomedical reports · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Colorectal Cancer: Risk Factors, Novel Approaches in Molecular Screening and Treatment.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Updated epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers in East Asia.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin C S WongSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
C H ChanSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jiayan LinSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jason L W HuangSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Junjie HuangSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yuan FangSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Wilson W L CheungSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
C P YuSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
John C T WongSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Gary TseSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Justin C Y WuSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Francis K L ChanSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Li Ping Medical Library, Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, Hong Kong, China. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExisting algorithms predicting the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) assign a fixed score for family history of CRC. Whether the increased CRC risk attributed to family history of CRC was higher in younger patients remains inconclusive. We examined the risk of CRC associated with family history of CRC in first-degree relative (FDR) according to the age of index subjects (<40 vs. ≥40; <50 vs. ≥50; and <60 vs. ≥60 years).

methodsOvid Medline, EMBASE, and gray literature from the reference lists of all identified studies were searched from their inception to March 2017. We included case-control/cohort studies that investigated the relationship between family history of CRC in FDR and prevalence of CRC. Two reviewers independently selected articles according to the PRISMA guideline. A random effects meta-analysis pooled relative risks (RR).

resultsWe analyzed 9.28 million subjects from 63 studies. A family history of CRC in FDR confers a higher risk of CRC (RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.57-1.97, p < 0.001). This increased risk was higher in younger individuals (RR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.67-6.49 for <40 years versus RR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.24-1.62 for ≥40 years, p = 0.017; RR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.94-4.07 for <50 years versus RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.28-1.69 for ≥50 years, p = 0.001). No publication bias was identified, and the findings are robust in subgroup analyses.

conclusionsThe increase in relative risk of CRC attributed to family history was found to be higher in younger individuals. Family history of CRC could be assigned a higher score for younger subjects in CRC risk prediction algorithms. Future studies should examine if such approach may improve their predictive capability.

Indexed as

Medical History TakingModels, BiologicalAdultAge FactorsAlgorithmsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID29867176
PMCPMC6768593
OpenAlexW2806758159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.