Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29867154›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2018

Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of upgrading and upstaging in patients with prostate cancer on biopsy: a radical prostatectomy multicenter cohort study.

Cosimo De Nunzio, Aldo Brassetti, Giuseppe Simone, Riccardo Lombardo, Riccardo Mastroianni, Devis Collura, Giovanni Muto, Michele Gallucci, Andrea Tubaro

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cosimo De NunzioDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy. cosimodenunzio@virgilio.it.
Aldo BrassettiDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SimoneDepartment of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-9025
Riccardo LombardoDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo MastroianniDepartment of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Devis ColluraDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni MutoDepartment of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Michele GallucciDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Andrea TubaroDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, "La Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITOspedale San Giovanni Bosco · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backroundRecently metabolic syndrome has been associated to an increased risk of advanced disease. Aim of our study is to investigate the association of metabolic syndrome (MetS) with the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) upgrading and upstaging after radical prostatectomy (RP).

methodsFrom 2012 and 2016, 400 consecutive men underwent RP at three referral centers in Italy and were enrolled into a prospective database. Blood pressure, body mass index and waist circumference were measured before RP. Blood samples were also collected and tested for total PSA, fasting glucose, triglycerides and HDLs. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between MetS, defined according to Adult Treatment Panel III, and the risk of upgrading and upstaging), using the new Prognostic Grade Group (PGG) classification system.

resultsOverall 148/400 (37%) men were diagnosed with MetS and most of these reported up-grading (54.5%) and up-staging (56.8%). These events were significantly more common in this population and MetS was a risk factor for up-staging and up-grading on multivariable analysis. Patients with MetS presented worst accuracy (72 vs. 84%; p = 0.001) and worst kappa coefficient of agreement (k = 0.439 ± 0.071 vs. k = 0.553 ± 0.071) between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens when compared to patients without MetS.

conclusionsMetS represents a significant risk factor for upgrading and upstaging. Accuracy of PGG system on biopsy is poor in patients with MetS, therefore results should be evaluated carefully in this population.

Indexed as

AgedBiopsy, NeedleHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective StudiesProstateProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID29867154
OpenAlexW2806711777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.