Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866916›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Consumption, contact and copulation: how pathogens have shaped human psychological adaptations.

Debra Lieberman, Joseph Billingsley, Carlton Patrick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. "Touch Me If You Can!": Individual Differences in Disease Avoidance and Social Touch.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathogen disgust sensitivity protects against infection in a high pathogen environment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Infection threat shapes our social instincts.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Touch in the era of the coronavirus pandemic.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Evolution of pathogen and parasite avoidance behaviours.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  11. COVID-19 and Memory: A Novel Contamination Effect in Memory.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Debra LiebermanDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA debra@miami.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4266-1395
Joseph BillingsleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6577-175X
Carlton PatrickDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disgust is an emotion intimately linked to pathogen avoidance. Building on prior work, we suggest disgust is an output of programmes that evolved to address three separate adaptive problems: what to eat, what to touch and with whom to have sex. We briefly discuss the architecture of these programmes, specifying their perceptual inputs and the contextual factors that enable them to generate adaptive and flexible behaviour. We propose that our sense of disgust is the result of these programmes and occurs when information-processing circuitries assess low expected values of consumption, low expected values of contact or low expected sexual values. This conception of disgust differs from prior models in that it dissects pathogen-related selection pressures into adaptive problems related to consumption and contact rather than assuming just one pathogen disgust system, and it excludes moral disgust from the domain of disgust proper. Instead, we illustrate how low expected values of consumption and contact as well as low expected sexual values can be used by our moral psychology to provide multiple causal links between disgust and morality.This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Evolution of pathogen and parasite avoidance behaviours'.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCoitusDisgustEatingHost-Pathogen InteractionsTouchCopulationHumansModels, Psychologicaldisgustmoralitypathogen avoidancesexual disgust

Identifiers

PMID29866916
PMCPMC6000137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.