Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866912›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Parasite insight: assessing fitness costs, infection risks and foraging benefits relating to gastrointestinal nematodes in wild mammalian herbivores.

Graeme Coulson, Jemma K Cripps, Sarah Garnick, Verity Bristow, Ian Beveridge

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sublethal effects of parasitism on ruminants can have cascading consequences for ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nematophagous fungi as biological control agents of parasitic nematodes in soils of wildlife parks.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Exploring animal enclosures and parasite interactions in Germany.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating the Presence of Disgust in Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Experimental removal of nematode parasites increases growth, sprint speed, and mating success in brown anole lizards.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2022
    Article
  19. A tale of two nematodes: Climate mediates mustelid infection by nematodes across the geographical range.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022
    Article
  20. Infectious disease macroecology: parasite diversity and dynamics across the globe.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Graeme CoulsonSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia gcoulson@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9873-8203
Jemma K CrippsSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Sarah GarnickSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Verity BristowSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Ian BeveridgeFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Veterinary Clinical Centre, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUArthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian herbivores are typically infected by parasitic nematodes, which are acquired through direct, faecal-oral transmission. These parasites can cause significant production losses in domestic livestock, but much less is known about impacts on wild mammalian hosts. We review three elements of parasitism from the host's perspective: fitness costs of infection, risks of infection during foraging and benefits of nutritious pasture. The majority of wildlife studies have been observational, but experimental manipulation is increasing. Treatment with anthelmintics to manipulate parasite load has revealed varied impacts of parasites on fitness variables across host species, but has not produced consistent evidence for parasite-induced anorexia or impaired body condition. Some experimental studies of infection risk have manipulated faecal contamination and detected faecal avoidance by hosts. Only two field studies have explored the trade-off between infection risk and nutritional benefit generated by avoidance of contaminated patches. Overall, field studies of costs, risks and benefits of the host-parasite relationship are limited and few have examined more than one of these elements. Parasitism has much in common with predation, and future insights into anti-parasite responses by wild hosts could be gained from the conceptual and technical developments in research on anti-predator behaviour.This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Evolution of pathogen and parasite avoidance behaviours'.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorGenetic FitnessMammalsAnimalsGastrointestinal DiseasesHerbivoryHost-Parasite InteractionsNematode InfectionsPrevalenceRiskanthelmintic treatmentanti-predator behaviourfaecal avoidancegastrointestinal nematodesmammalian herbivoresparasite co-infection

Identifiers

PMID29866912
PMCPMC6000135
OpenAlexW2806938285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.