Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866737›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Preventing chronic disease in patients with low health literacy using eHealth and teamwork in primary healthcare: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Sharon M Parker, Nigel Stocks, Don Nutbeam, Louise Thomas, Elizabeth Denney-Wilson, Nicholas Zwar, Jon Karnon, Jane Lloyd, Manny Noakes, Siaw-Teng Liaw and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Digital Health Literacy: Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sharon M ParkerCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nigel StocksDiscipline of General Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Don NutbeamSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise ThomasCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth Denney-WilsonSydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas ZwarSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Jon KarnonSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jane LloydCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Manny NoakesNutrition and Health Program, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Siaw-Teng LiawSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5989-3614
Annie LauCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Richard OsborneSchool of Health and Social Development, Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mark F HarrisCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0705-8913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdults with lower levels of health literacy are less likely to engage in health-promoting behaviours. Our trial evaluates the impacts and outcomes of a mobile health-enhanced preventive intervention in primary care for people who are overweight or obese. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-arm pragmatic practice-level cluster randomised trial will be conducted in 40 practices in low socioeconomic areas in Sydney and Adelaide, Australia. Forty patients aged 40-70 years with a body mass index ≥28 kg/m ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the University of New South Wales (UNSW) Human Research Ethics Committee (HC17474) and ratified by the University of Adelaide Human Research Ethics committee. There are no restrictions on publication, and findings of the study will be made available to the public via the Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity website and through conference presentations and research publications. Deidentified data and meta-data will be stored in a repository at UNSW and made available subject to ethics committee approval. TRIAL REGISTRATIONREGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001508369; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyTelemedicineAustraliaBody Mass IndexChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisExerciseHealthy LifestyleHumansObesityOverweightPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocioeconomic Factorshealth literacym-healthobesityoverweightpreventive medicineprimary care

Identifiers

PMID29866737
PMCPMC5988137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.