Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866710›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Receptionists' role in new approaches to consultations in primary care: a focused ethnographic study.

Heather Dawn Brant, Helen Atherton, Annemieke Bikker, Tania Porqueddu, Chris Salisbury, Brian McKinstry, John Campbell, Andy Gibson, Sue Ziebland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolution of the general practice receptionist role and online services: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. "Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Unintended consequences of online consultations: a qualitative study in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Heather Dawn BrantNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.
Helen AthertonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick.
Annemieke BikkerUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Tania PorquedduNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Brian McKinstryUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
John CampbellUniversity of Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter, Exeter.
Andy GibsonHealth and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol.
Sue ZieblandNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/13/59/08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe receptionist is pivotal to the smooth running of general practice in the UK, communicating with patients and booking appointments.

aimThe authors aimed to explore the role of the receptionist in the implementation of new approaches to consultations in primary care. DESIGN AND

settingThe authors conducted a team-based focused ethnography. Three researchers observed eight general practices across England and Scotland between June 2015 and May 2016.

methodInterviews were conducted with 39 patients and 45 staff in the practices, all of which had adopted one or more methods (telephone, email, e-consultation, or internet video) for providing an alternative to face-to-face consultation.

resultsReceptionists have a key role in facilitating patient awareness regarding new approaches to consultations in primary care, while at the same time ensuring that patients receive a consultation appropriate to their needs. In this study, receptionists' involvement in implementation and planning for the introduction of alternative approaches to face-to-face consultations was minimal, despite the expectation that they would be involved in delivery.

conclusionA shared understanding within practices of the potential difficulties and extra work that might ensue for reception staff was lacking. This might contribute to the low uptake by patients of potentially important innovations in service delivery. Involvement of the wider practice team in planning and piloting changes, supporting team members through service reconfiguration, and providing an opportunity to discuss and contribute to modifications of any new system would ensure that reception staff are suitably prepared to support the introduction of a new approach to consultations.

Indexed as

Medical ReceptionistsAnthropology, CulturalAppointments and SchedulesCommunicationEnglandGeneral PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansPractice ManagementReferral and ConsultationScotlandcommunicationfamily practicefocused ethnographygeneral practicemedical receptionistsprimary carequalitative researchremote consultation

Identifiers

PMID29866710
PMCPMC6014429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.