ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018
Digital Health Intervention for Asthma: Patient-Reported Value and Usability.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of new digital technologies and telemedicine in pulmonary rehabilitation : Smart devices in the treatment of chronic respiratory diseases.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Digital Interventions for Pediatric Asthma Management.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of Digital Self-Monitoring on Patient Engagement and Clinical Outcomes in Severe Asthma: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Objective detection of wheeze at home by parents through a digital device: usage patterns and relationship with SABA administration.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Trial
- A randomised controlled trial of the effect of a connected inhaler system on medication adherence in uncontrolled asthmatic patients.The European respiratory journal · 2021Trial
- Usability testing of two co-designed discharge communication tools for use in pediatric emergency departments: findings from the EDUCATE study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Experiences of a Digital Self-Management System for Asthma: Qualitative Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- iPREDICT: Characterization of Asthma Triggers and Selection of Digital Technology to Predict Changes in Disease Control.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2024Article
- Technology-Assisted Stepped-Care to Promote Adherence in Adolescents with Asthma: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2023Article
- Impact of a digital web-based asthma platform, a real-life study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Digital therapeutics from bench to bedside.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Impact of Electronic Monitoring Devices of Inhalers in Adults with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Will they or won't they? Understanding New Zealand adults' attitudes towards using digital interventions.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Use of machine learning to identify patients at risk of sub-optimal adherence: study based on real-world data from 10,929 children using a connected auto-injector device.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Perceptions of Environmental Influence and Environmental Information-Seeking Behavior Among People With Asthma and COPD.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Pilot Study of a Patient Experience with an ELLIPTA Inhaler Electronic Medication Monitor and Associated Integrated System: A Prospective Observational Study Using the COPD Patient-Powered Research Network.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2021Article
- The applications of eHealth technologies in the management of asthma and allergic diseases.Clinical and translational allergy · 2021Review
- Feasibility and Acceptability of an Asthma App to Monitor Medication Adherence: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Observational
- Monitoring Adherence to Asthma Inhalers Using the InspirerMundi App: Analysis of Real-World, Medium-Term Feasibility Studies.Frontiers in medical technology · 2021Article
- Biomedical REAl-Time Health Evaluation (BREATHE): toward an mHealth informatics platform.JAMIA open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough digital health tools are increasingly recognized as effective in improving clinical outcomes such as asthma control and medication adherence, few studies have assessed patient experiences and perception of value.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, perception of usability and value, and desire to continue after 12 months of using a digital health intervention to support asthma management.
methodsParticipants were enrolled in a randomized controlled study evaluating the impact of a digital health platform for asthma management. Participants used electronic inhaler sensors to track medication use and accessed their information in a digital health platform. Electronic surveys were administered to intervention arm participants aged 12 years and older after 12 months of use. The survey assessed asthma control, patient satisfaction with the sensor device, and perception of the usability and value of the digital health platform through closed-ended and open-ended questions. Logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of participants' characteristics on survey completion, satisfaction, and perception of value.
resultsOf the 207 intervention arm participants aged 12 years and older, 89 submitted survey responses (42.9% response rate). Of these 89 participants, 70 reported being very satisfied (79%, 70/89) or somewhat satisfied (20%, 18/89) with the inhaler sensor device. Moreover, 93% (83/89) expressed satisfaction with the reports, and 90% (80/89) found the information from the reports useful for learning about their asthma. In addition, 72% (64/89) of the participants reported that they were interested in continuing to use the sensor and platform beyond the study. There were no significant differences in satisfaction with the device or the platform across participants' characteristics, including device type, age, sex, insurance type, asthma control, or syncing history; however, participants with smartphones and longer participation were more likely to take the survey.
conclusionsElectronic sensors and a digital health platform were well received by participants who reported satisfaction and perceived value. These results were consistent across multiple participants' characteristics. These findings can add to a limited literature to keep improving digital health interventions and ensure the meaningful and enduring impact on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.