ReviewJMIR medical informatics2018
Health Information Technology in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety: Literature Review.
Review in JMIR medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Development and Validation of SafeHIT: An Instrument to Assess the Self-Reported Safe Use of Health Information Technology.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Doctor performance drivers: insights from various theoretical perspectives.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Prediction of prolonged length of stay from first 2 days of hospitalization data: a SHAP value-based variable selection method for a simplified model.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025Article
- Connected Healthcare System Technology Interventions to Improve Patient Safety by Reducing Medical Errors: A Systematic Review.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2025Review
- AHRQ's digital healthcare research program: 20 years of advancing innovation and discovery.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Advancements in ambulatory care pharmacy practice in Saudi Arabia: A comprehensive review of innovations and best practices at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024Article
- Development of the information quality scale for health information supply chain type 2 diabetes mellitus management using exploratory factor analysis.Journal of public health research · 2023Article
- Using automated methods to detect safety problems with health information technology: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- The Role of Access Type and Age Group in the Breadth of Use of Patient Portals: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Observational
- Nurse-led consultations reinforced with eHealth technology: a qualitative study of the experiences of patients with gynecological cancer.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Advancing Pharmacogenomics from Single-Gene to Preemptive Testing.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022Review
- Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Information Technology Ambidexterity, Digital Dynamic Capability, and Knowledge Processes as Enablers of Patient Agility: Empirical Study.JMIRx med · 2021Article
- Information Security Awareness and Behaviors of Health Care Professionals at Public Health Care Facilities.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Measuring the Interactions Between Health Demand, Informatics Supply, and Technological Applications in Digital Medical Innovation for China: Content Mapping and Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Review
- Machine Learning Classification of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children Based on a Large Real-World Pediatric Cohort CEDATA-GPGE® Registry.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Unpacking Prevalence and Dichotomy in Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Parameters: Observational Data-Driven Approach Backed by Sepsis Pathophysiology.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Mutual-Aid Mobile App for Emergency Care: Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe area of healthcare quality and patient safety is starting to use health information technology to prevent reportable events, identify them before they become issues, and act on events that are thought to be unavoidable. As healthcare organizations begin to explore the use of health information technology in this realm, it is often unclear where fiscal and human efforts should be focused.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to provide a foundation for understanding where to focus health information technology fiscal and human resources as well as expectations for the use of health information technology in healthcare quality and patient safety.
methodsA literature review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications reporting on the actual use of health information technology in healthcare quality and patient safety. Inductive thematic analysis with open coding was used to categorize a total of 41 studies. Three pre-set categories were used: prevention, identification, and action. Three additional categories were formed through coding: challenges, outcomes, and location.
resultsThis study identifies five main categories across seven study settings. A majority of the studies used health IT for identification and prevention of healthcare quality and patient safety issues. In this realm, alerts, clinical decision support, and customized health IT solutions were most often implemented. Implementation, interface design, and culture were most often noted as challenges.
conclusionsThis study provides valuable information as organizations determine where they stand to get the most "bang for their buck" relative to health IT for quality and patient safety. Knowing what implementations are being effectivity used by other organizations helps with fiscal and human resource planning as well as managing expectations relative to cost, scope, and outcomes. The findings from this scan of the literature suggest that having organizational champion leaders that can shepherd implementation, impact culture, and bridge knowledge with developers would be a valuable resource allocation to consider.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.