ArticleJournal of prosthodontic research2018
Development, validity and reliability of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale - Spanish version.
Article in Journal of prosthodontic research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral determinants of dental and facial esthetic self-perception among an academic population: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2025Observational
- Article
- Development and validation of the Italian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-I).Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Differential Item Functioning of the Jaw Functional Limitation ScaleJournal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2023Article
- Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Article
- Article
- Development of a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Including the patient's oral health perspective in evidence-based decision-making.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021Review
- Validation of the Chinese version of the Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ).Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics on dental patients.International dental journal · 2020Article
- Development and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Pt.PeerJ · 2020Article
- The Predictive Value of Orofacial Esthetic Components on Quality of Life: Pilot Insights from a Serbian Sample using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a Spanish version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-Sp) and to determine its psychometric properties in dental patients.
methodsWe performed a validation study for OES development and validation into Spanish. In the development phase, eight individuals participated in the translation process (cross-cultural adaptation) following the PROMIS methodology. In the validation phase, 331 dental patients (age mean±sd: 42.9±12.3years, 59 % female) from the HealthPartners dental clinics in Minnesota, USA responded to a survey of Spanish speaking patients (n=540, response rate: 61 %). We first explored dimensionality by means of exploratory factor analysis and scree plot, and then we computed reliability measures with the Cronbach's alpha statistic. Finally, we assessed convergent validity by computing Pearson/Spearman rank correlations between OES-Sp and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-based orofacial appearance measures. All statistical procedures were performed using Stata v.13 for Windows (StataCorp).
resultsExploratory factor analysis provided evidence that a single factor represents the Spanish OES version. Score reliability was high with Cronbach's alpha statistic of 0.95 (lower limit of the 95 % CI: 0.94). Score validity was sufficient indicated by Pearson and Spearman rank correlations between -0.53 and -0.69 (all 95 % confidence intervals: less than ± 0.10).
conclusionsOES is a valuable instrument to measure the orofacial appearance construct for Spanish-speaking populations. OES was concluded to be unidimensional with excellent score reliability and sufficient convergent score validity when compared with other Orofacial Appearance measures. Our results suggest that OES could be used in Spanish-speaking patients, an important and growing population around the globe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.