Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866386›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2018

Smoking outcome expectancies predict smoking during voucher-based treatment for smokers with substance use disorders.

Cara M Murphy, Rosemarie A Martin, Jennifer W Tidey, Suzanne M Colby, Damaris J Rohsenow

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cara M MurphyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Rosemarie A MartinCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Jennifer W TideyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Suzanne M ColbyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Damaris J RohsenowCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: Damaris_Rohsenow@brown.edu.
Brown University · US

Funding

Substance Abuse Intervention/Outcome Research TrainingT32DA016184 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Damaris J. Rohsenow, JENNIFER W. TIDEY · 2003 to 2026
$6.1M
MOTIVATING SUBSTANCE ABUSERS TO QUIT SMOKINGR01DA013616 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROHSENOW, DAMARIS J. · 2001 to 2005
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA042415NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013616NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStrong expectations regarding positive effects of smoking may reduce the likelihood of successfully quitting. The Smoking Effects Questionnaire (SEQ) assesses the importance of seven expected positive and negative effects of smoking. SEQ was used to predict responses to contingent monetary rewards for smoking abstinence among smokers with substance use disorders (SUD).

methodsSmokers (N = 184) in residential (i.e., 24 h/day) treatment for SUD received 19 consecutive days of either contingent vouchers (CV) for smoking abstinence (twice-daily carbon monoxide [CO] readings) or non-contingent vouchers (NV) plus counseling to motivate smoking cessation. Analyses investigated effects of smoking expectancies on days of smoking within-treatment and number of cigarettes/day at 1 month post-treatment.

resultsHigher positive expectancies for reduced negative affect, weight control, stimulation and positive social effects from smoking were related to more days of smoking during treatment only for participants in the CV condition. Post-treatment, expecting positive social and stimulating effects from smoking were related to more smoking only among CV participants. In both conditions, negative expectancies were largely unrelated to smoking outcomes.

conclusionsThe moderation of CV by positive smoking expectancies suggests that those who rate positive expectancies as more important may require a complementary treatment or different incentives to reduce smoking. The SEQ was probably unassociated with smoking in NV due to little reduction in smoking behavior. Helping smokers with SUD develop alternative ways to produce positive effects sought from smoking may be important to improve initial smoking outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultCarbon MonoxideCounselingFemaleHumansMaleMotivationResidential TreatmentRewardSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesCarbon MonoxideContingent vouchersNicotine dependenceSmoking cessationSmoking expectancies

Identifiers

PMID29866386
PMCPMC6277058
OpenAlexW2799704942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.