Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866384›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2018

Focus groups to increase the cultural acceptability of a contingency management intervention for American Indian and Alaska Native Communities.

Katherine A Hirchak, Emily Leickly, Jalene Herron, Jennifer Shaw, Jordan Skalisky, Lisa G Dirks, Jaedon P Avey, Sterling McPherson, Jenny Nepom, Dennis Donovan and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine A HirchakInitiative for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Program of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
Emily LeicklyDepartment of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA.
Jalene HerronInitiative for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
Jennifer ShawSouthcentral Foundation, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Jordan SkaliskyInitiative for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Program of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
Lisa G DirksSouthcentral Foundation, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Jaedon P AveySouthcentral Foundation, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Sterling McPhersonProgram of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, WA, USA; Providence Medical Research Center, Providence Health Care, Spokane, WA, USA.
Jenny NepomInitiative for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
Dennis DonovanAlcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Dedra BuchwaldInitiative for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, WA, USA.
Michael G McDonellInitiative for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Program of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA; Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, WA, USA. Electronic address: mmcdonell@wsu.edu.
HONOR Study Team
Washington State University Spokane · USSouthcentral Foundation · USPortland State University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Transition to RecoveryP60AA026112 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Denise A Dillard, Michael G McDonell · 2018 to 2026
$10.7M
Contingency Management Treatment of Alcohol Abuse American Indian PeopleR01AA022070 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUCHWALD, DEDRA S, MCDONELL, MICHAEL G · 2013 to 2017
$3.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA026112NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people seek evidence-based, cost-effective, and culturally acceptable solutions for treating alcohol use disorders. Contingency management (CM) is a feasible, low-cost approach to treating alcohol use disorders that uses "reinforcers" to promote and support alcohol abstinence. CM has not been evaluated among AI/AN communities. This study explored the cultural acceptability of CM and adapted it for use in diverse AI/AN communities.

methodsWe conducted a total of nine focus groups in three AI/AN communities: a rural reservation, an urban health clinic, and a large Alaska Native healthcare system. Respondents included adults in recovery, adults with current drinking problems, service providers, and other interested community members (n = 61). Focus group questions centered on the cultural appropriateness of "reinforcers" used to incentivize abstinence and the cultural acceptability of the intervention. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded independently by two study team members using both a priori and emergent codes. We then analyzed coded data.

resultsAcross all three locations, focus group participants described the importance of providing both culturally specific (e.g., bead work and cultural art work supplies), as well as practical (e.g., gas cards and bus passes) reinforcers. Focus group participants underscored the importance of providing reinforcers for the children and family of intervention participants to assist with reengaging with family and rebuilding trust that may have been damaged during alcohol use. Respondents indicated that they believed CM was in alignment with AI/AN cultural values. There was consensus that Elders or a well-respected community member implementing this intervention would enhance participation. Focus group participants emphasized use of the local AI/AN language, in addition to the inclusion of appropriate cultural symbols and imagery in the delivery of the intervention.

conclusionsA CM intervention for alcohol use disorders should be in alignment with existing cultural and community practices such as alcohol abstinence, is more likely to be successful when Elders and community leaders are champions of the intervention, the intervention is compatible with counseling or treatment methodologies, and the intervention provides rewards that are both culturally specific and practical.

Indexed as

AlcoholismAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeBehavior TherapyAdultAlcohol AbstinenceCulturally Competent CareFocus GroupsHumansRewardRural PopulationUrban PopulationAlcohol use treatmentAmerican Indian/Alaska NativesContingency managementTreatment adaptation

Identifiers

PMID29866384
PMCPMC6014612
OpenAlexW2802813728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.