Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866200›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2018

An evaluation of the short physical performance battery following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Petra Larsson, Christine Råheim Borge, Malin Nygren-Bonnier, Anners Lerdal, Anne Edvardsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02314338 (The Short Physical Performance Battery in COPD - Possible Impact of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program and Relationships to Other Physical Performance Measures, Symptoms, and Quality of Life.), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02314338 nacompletednot on this map

The Short Physical Performance Battery in COPD - Possible Impact of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program and Relationships to Other Physical Performance Measures, Symptoms, and Quality of Life.

TypeinterventionalSponsorLHL HelseRan2014 to 2015Enrolled50ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsPulmonary rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effectiveness ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Petra LarssonSection of Physiotherapy, Department of Surgery, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Postboks 4970, 0440, Oslo, Norway. larsson_petra@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-8287
Christine Råheim BorgeDepartment of Research, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Postboks 4970, 0440, Oslo, Norway.
Malin Nygren-BonnierDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Functional Area Occupational therapy and Physiotherapy, Allied Health Professionals Function, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anners LerdalDepartment of Research, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Postboks 4970, 0440, Oslo, Norway.
Anne EdvardsenDepartment of Respiratory Physiology and Exercise Physiology, LHL Hospital Gardermoen, Ragnar Strøms veg 10, 2067, Jessheim, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOKarolinska University Hospital · SELovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is a need for simple tools to evaluate physical performance in patients with COPD before and after pulmonary rehabilitation. The aims of this study were to evaluate changes in short physical performance battery (SPPB)-scores in patients with COPD after a 4-week pulmonary rehabilitation program; explore possible relationships between SPPB-scores and exercise capacity (6-min walk distance), dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council's dyspnea scale), disease-specific quality of life (COPD assessment test), and pulmonary function (predicted forced expiratory volume in one second) at baseline; and explore if changes in SPPB-scores are related to changes in exercise capacity, dyspnea, and disease-specific quality of life following pulmonary rehabilitation.

resultsForty-five patients with COPD were included in the final analysis. SPPB-scores improved following pulmonary rehabilitation (mean change: 1.2 ± 1.7 points, p < 0.001). There were moderate correlations between SPPB-scores and exercise capacity (r = 0.50, p < 0.001) and dyspnea (r = - 0.45, p = 0.003) at baseline, but not with pulmonary function or disease-specific quality of life. Changes in SPPB-scores were not associated with changes in exercise capacity or dyspnea scores. The SPPB may be a useful tool for evaluating physical performance in COPD Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02314338, December 11, 2014.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overExerciseExercise TestFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeRespiratory Function TestsChronic obstructiveExercise testPulmonary diseaseRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID29866200
PMCPMC5987524
OpenAlexW2805097170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.