Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866184›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2018

Predicting the in vivo pulmonary toxicity induced by acute exposure to poorly soluble nanomaterials by using advanced in vitro methods.

Thomas Loret, Françoise Rogerieux, Bénédicte Trouiller, Anne Braun, Christophe Egles, Ghislaine Lacroix

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transcriptomic profile of TiOArchives of toxicology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Application of the market-ready NAVETTA electrodeposition chamber for controlledComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Predicting nanomaterials pulmonary toxicity in animals by cell culture models: Achievements and perspectives.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dry Generation of CeONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas LoretInstitut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), (DRC/VIVA/TOXI), Parc Technologique ALATA - BP 2, F-60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Françoise RogerieuxInstitut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), (DRC/VIVA/TOXI), Parc Technologique ALATA - BP 2, F-60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Bénédicte TrouillerInstitut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), (DRC/VIVA/TOXI), Parc Technologique ALATA - BP 2, F-60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Anne BraunInstitut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), (DRC/VIVA/TOXI), Parc Technologique ALATA - BP 2, F-60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Christophe EglesUniversité de Technologie de Compiègne (UTC), Laboratoire BioMécanique et BioIngénierie (BMBI), UMR CNRS 7338, 60205, Compiègne, France.
Ghislaine LacroixInstitut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), (DRC/VIVA/TOXI), Parc Technologique ALATA - BP 2, F-60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France. ghislaine.lacroix@ineris.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3260-8526
Institut national de l'environnement industriel et des risques · FRUniversité de Technologie de Compiègne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal models remain at that time a reference tool to predict potential pulmonary adverse effects of nanomaterials in humans. However, in a context of reduction of the number of animals used in experimentation, there is a need for reliable alternatives. In vitro models using lung cells represent relevant alternatives to assess potential nanomaterial acute toxicity by inhalation, particularly since advanced in vitro methods and models have been developed. Nevertheless, the ability of in vitro experiments to replace animal experimentation for predicting potential acute pulmonary toxicity in human still needs to be carefully assessed. The aim of the study was to evaluate the differences existing between the in vivo and the in vitro approaches for the prediction of nanomaterial toxicity and to find advanced methods to enhance in vitro predictivity. For this purpose, rats or pneumocytes in co-culture with macrophages were exposed to the same poorly soluble and poorly toxic TiO

resultsFor each dose metric used (mass/alveolar surface or mass/macrophage), we observed that the most realistic in vitro exposure method, the air-liquid interface method, was the most predictive of in vivo effects regarding biological activation levels. We also noted less differences between in vivo and in vitro results when doses were normalized by the number of macrophages rather than by the alveolar surface. Lastly, although we observed similarities in the nanomaterial ranking using in vivo and in vitro approaches, the quality of the data-set was insufficient to provide clear ranking comparisons.

conclusionsWe showed that advanced methods could be used to enhance in vitro experiments ability to predict potential acute pulmonary toxicity in vivo. Moreover, we showed that the timing of the dose delivery could be controlled to enhance the predictivity. Further studies should be necessary to assess if air-liquid interface provide more reliable ranking of nanomaterials than submerged methods.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAlveolar Epithelial CellsAnimalsAnimal Use AlternativesBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCeriumCoculture TechniquesCytokinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansInhalation ExposureMacrophagesMaleNanostructuresParticle SizePredictive Value of Testsceric oxideCeriumCytokinesReactive Oxygen SpeciesTitaniumtitanium dioxideAcute exposureAir-liquid interfaceAlternative toxicity testingIn vivo - in vitro comparisonPoorly soluble nanomaterialsPulmonary toxicity

Identifiers

PMID29866184
PMCPMC5987386
OpenAlexW2805471158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.