Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866163›Full record

ArticleBMC international health and human rights2018

Language interpretation conditions and boundaries in multilingual and multicultural emergency healthcare.

Christina Lundin, Emina Hadziabdic, Katarina Hjelm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC international health and human rights, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina LundinDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies, University of Linköping, Campus Norrköping, S- 601 74, Norrköping, Sweden.
Emina HadziabdicDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies, University of Linköping, Campus Norrköping, S- 601 74, Norrköping, Sweden.
Katarina HjelmDepartment of Social and Welfare Studies, University of Linköping, Campus Norrköping, S- 601 74, Norrköping, Sweden. katarina.hjelm@liu.se.
Linköping University · SENorrköping Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet (The Swedish Research Council), Sweden, reference number: 521-2013-2533. 521-2013-2533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith an increasing migrant population globally the need to organize interpreting service arises in emergency healthcare to deliver equitable high-quality care. The aims of this study were to describe interpretation practices in multilingual emergency health service institutions and to explore the impact of the organizational and institutional context and possible consequences of different approaches to interpretation. No previous studies on these issues in multilingual emergency care have been found.

methodsA qualitative descriptive study was used. Forty-six healthcare professionals were purposively recruited from different organizational levels in ambulance service and psychiatric and somatic emergency care units. Data were collected between December 2014 and April 2015 through focus-group and individual interviews, and analyzed by qualitative content analysis.

resultsOrganization of interpreters was based on patients' health status, context of emergency care, and access to interpreter service. Differences existed between workplaces regarding the use of interpreters: in somatic emergency care bilingual healthcare staff and family members were used to a limited extent; in psychiatric emergency care the norm was to use professional interpreters on the spot; and in ambulance service persons available at the time, e.g. family and friends were used. Similarities were found in: procuring a professional interpreter, mainly based on informal workplace routines, sometimes on formal guidelines and national laws, but knowledge of existing laws was limited; the ideal was a linguistically competent interpreter with a professional attitude, and organizational aspects such as appropriate time, technical and social environment; and wishes for development of better procedures for prompt access to professional interpreters at the workplace, regardless of organizational context, and education of interpreters and users.

conclusionUse of interpreters was determined by health professionals, based on the patients' health status, striving to deliver as fast and individualized care as possible based on humanistic values. Defects in organizational routines need to be rectified and transcultural awareness is needed to achieve the aim of person-centered and equal healthcare. Clear formal guidelines for the use of interpreters in emergency healthcare need to be developed and it is important to fulfill health professionals' wishes for future development of prompt access to interpreters and education of interpreters and users.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersCultural DiversityLanguageMultilingualismTranslatingAdultDelivery of Health CareEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFocus GroupsHealth StatusHumansMaleQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareEmergency careHealth care professionalsLanguage interpreter practicesMigrants’ healthOrganization

Identifiers

PMID29866163
PMCPMC5987383
OpenAlexW2806911335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.