Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866144›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2018

Standardised data reporting from pre-hospital advanced airway management - a nominal group technique update of the Utstein-style airway template.

G A Sunde, A Kottmann, J K Heltne, M Sandberg, M Gellerfors, A Krüger, D Lockey, S J M Sollid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Airway registries in primarily adult, emergent endotracheal intubation: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

G A SundeNorwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway. geir.arne.sunde@norskluftambulanse.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1606-5795
A KottmannNorwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway.
J K HeltneDept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
M SandbergAir Ambulance Dept., Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
M GellerforsKarolinska Institutet, Dept. of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Stockholm, Sweden.
A KrügerNorwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway.
D LockeyFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
S J M SollidNorwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway.
Stiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse · NOOslo University Hospital · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOKarolinska Institutet · SELondon Ambulance Service NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Stiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse 3104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-hospital advanced airway management with oxygenation and ventilation may be vital for managing critically ill or injured patients. To improve pre-hospital critical care and develop evidence-based guidelines, research on standardised high-quality data is important. We aimed to identify which airway data were most important to report today and to revise and update a previously reported Utstein-style airway management dataset.

methodsWe recruited sixteen international experts in pre-hospital airway management from Australia, United States of America, and Europe. We used a five-step modified nominal group technique to revise the dataset, and clinical study results from the original template were used to guide the process.

resultsThe experts agreed on a key dataset of thirty-two operational variables with six additional system variables, organised in time, patient, airway management and system sections. Of the original variables, one remained unchanged, while nineteen were modified in name, category, definition or value. Sixteen new variables were added. The updated dataset covers risk factors for difficult intubation, checklist and standard operating procedure use, pre-oxygenation strategies, the use of drugs in airway management, airway currency training, developments in airway devices, airway management strategies, and patient safety issues not previously described.

conclusionsUsing a modified nominal group technique with international airway management experts, we have updated the Utstein-style dataset to report standardised data from pre-hospital advanced airway management. The dataset enables future airway management research to produce comparable high-quality data across emergency medical systems. We believe this approach will promote research and improve treatment strategies and outcomes for patients receiving pre-hospital advanced airway management.

trial registrationThe Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Western Norway exempted this study from ethical review (Reference: REK-Vest/2017/260).

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesIntubation, IntratrachealAdolescentAdultAirway ManagementAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolEuropeFemaleHospitalsHumansInfantMaleNorwayResearch DesignAir ambulancesAirway managementData accuracyEmergency medical servicesIntubation

Identifiers

PMID29866144
PMCPMC5987657
OpenAlexW2805849246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.