Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29866088›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2018

Evaluation of antiviral activity of Ocimum sanctum and Acacia arabica leaves extracts against H9N2 virus using embryonated chicken egg model.

S S Ghoke, R Sood, N Kumar, A K Pateriya, S Bhatia, A Mishra, R Dixit, V K Singh, D N Desai, D D Kulkarni and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Investigation of phytochemicals isolated from selected Saudi medicinal plants as natural inhibitors of SARS CoV-2 main protease: In vitroSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Potency of bacterial sialidaseVeterinary world · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S S GhokeNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
R SoodNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. richa.bhatia0609@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-5197
N KumarNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
A K PateriyaNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
S BhatiaNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
A MishraNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
R DixitNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
V K SinghNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
D N DesaiNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
D D KulkarniNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
U DimriIndian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
V P SinghNational Institute of High Security Animal Diseases, Anand Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
National Institute of High Security Animal Diseases · INIndian Veterinary Research Institute · INKrishi Vigyan Kendra, Latur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the view of endemic avian influenza H9N2 infection in poultry, its zoonotic potential and emergence of antiviral resistance, two herbal plants, Ocimum sanctum and Acacia arabica, which are easily available throughout various geographical locations in India were taken up to study their antiviral activity against H9N2 virus. We evaluated antiviral efficacy of three different extracts each from leaves of O. sanctum (crude extract, terpenoid and polyphenol) and A. arabica (crude extract, flavonoid and polyphenol) against H9N2 virus using in ovo model.

methodsThe antiviral efficacy of different leaves extracts was systematically studied in three experimental protocols viz. virucidal (dose-dependent), therapeutic (time-dependent) and prophylactic (dose-dependent) activity employing in ovo model. The maximum non-toxic concentration of each herbal extracts of O. sanctum and A. arabica in the specific pathogen free embryonated chicken eggs was estimated and their antiviral efficacy was determined in terms of reduction in viral titres, measured by Haemagglutination (HA) and real time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays.

resultsAll the extracts of O. sanctum (crude extract, terpenoid and polyphenol) and A. arabica (crude extract, flavonoid and polyphenol) showed significant virucidal activity, however, crude extract

conclusionsThe crude extract and terpenoid isolated from the leaves of O. sanctum and polyphenol from A. arabica has shown promising antiviral properties against H9N2 virus. Future investigations are necessary to formulate combinations of these compounds for the broader antiviral activity against H9N2 viruses and evaluate them in chickens.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsPlant ExtractsAcaciaAnimalsChick EmbryoInfluenza A Virus, H9N2 SubtypeOcimum sanctumPlant LeavesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionVirus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsPlant ExtractsA. arabicaAvian influenza H9N2HAin ovo testingO. sanctumReal time RT-qPCR

Identifiers

PMID29866088
PMCPMC5987647
OpenAlexW2805479737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.