Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29865900›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2018

Harms of Antipsychotics in Children and Young Adults: A Systematic Review Update.

Jennifer Pillay, Khrista Boylan, Amanda Newton, Lisa Hartling, Ben Vandermeer, Megan Nuspl, Tara MacGregor, Robin Featherstone, Normand Carrey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Obesity in Adolescents with Psychiatric Disorders.Current psychiatry reports · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Pillay1 University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Khrista Boylan2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Amanda Newton1 University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lisa Hartling1 University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ben Vandermeer1 University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Megan Nuspl1 University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Tara MacGregor1 University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Robin Featherstone1 University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Normand Carrey4 Douglas Research Institute and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo update and extend our previous systematic review on first- (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for treatment of psychiatric and behavioral conditions in children, adolescents, and young adults (aged ≤24 years). This article focuses on the evidence for harms.

methodWe searched (to April 2016) 8 databases, gray literature, trial registries, Food and Drug Administration reports, and reference lists. Two reviewers conducted study screening and selection independently, with consensus for selection. One reviewer extracted and another verified all data; 2 reviewers independently assessed risk of bias. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate and network meta-analysis across conditions for changes in body composition. Two reviewers reached consensus for ratings on the strength of evidence for prespecified outcomes.

resultsA total of 135 studies (95 trials and 40 observational) were included, and 126 reported on harms. FGAs caused slightly less weight gain and more extrapyramidal symptoms than SGAs. SGAs as a class caused adverse effects, including weight gain, high triglyceride levels, extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, and somnolence. They appeared to increase the risk for high cholesterol levels and type 2 diabetes. Many outcomes for individual drug comparisons were of low or insufficient strength of evidence. Olanzapine caused more short-term gains in weight and body mass index than several other SGAs. The dose of SGAs may not make a difference over the short term for some outcomes.

conclusionsClinicians need to weigh carefully the benefit-to-harm ratio when using antipsychotics, especially when treatment alternatives exist. More evidence is needed on the comparative harms between antipsychotics over the longer term.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntipsychotic AgentsChildHumansMental DisordersYoung AdultAntipsychotic Agentsantipsychotic agentschildrenpediatricsystematic reviewyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID29865900
PMCPMC6187435
OpenAlexW2807434104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.