Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29865872›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2018

Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States.

Elise F Morgan, Ginu U Unnikrisnan, Amira I Hussein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 338 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
338citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

338 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Effect of Type 2 Diabetes on Bone Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. 3D-modeling from hip DXA shows improved bone structure with romosozumab followed by denosumab or alendronate.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Trial
  4. iScience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Novel Double Arrowhead Auxetic Dental Splint for Avulsed Tooth Reimplantation.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical impact of acute symptomatic vertebral fractures in the United States: A patient survey and chart review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Observational
  17. Development of a Scaffold from the Cob ofJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

278 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elise F MorganOrthopaedic and Developmental Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA; email: efmorgan@bu.edu.
Ginu U UnnikrisnanOrthopaedic and Developmental Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA; email: efmorgan@bu.edu.
Amira I HusseinOrthopaedic and Developmental Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA; email: efmorgan@bu.edu.

Funding

3-D Visualization and Prediction of Vertebral FracturesR01AR054620 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MORGAN, ELISE F · 2008 to 2025
$6.7M
3-D Visualization and Prediction of Vertebral FracturesR56AR054620 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MORGAN, ELISE F · 2013 to 2013
$364k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR054620NIAMS NIH HHS R56 AR054620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical properties of bone are fundamental to the ability of our skeletons to support movement and to provide protection to our vital organs. As such, deterioration in mechanical behavior with aging and/or diseases such as osteoporosis and diabetes can have profound consequences for individuals' quality of life. This article reviews current knowledge of the basic mechanical behavior of bone at length scales ranging from hundreds of nanometers to tens of centimeters. We present the basic tenets of bone mechanics and connect them to some of the arcs of research that have brought the field to recent advances. We also discuss cortical bone, trabecular bone, and whole bones, as well as multiple aspects of material behavior, including elasticity, yield, fracture, fatigue, and damage. We describe the roles of bone quantity (e.g., density, porosity) and bone quality (e.g., cross-linking, protein composition), along with several avenues of future research.

Indexed as

AgingAnisotropyBone and BonesBone DensityBone DiseasesDiabetes MellitusElasticityFractures, BoneHumansModels, TheoreticalOsteoporosisPorosityQuality of LifeStress, MechanicalViscositybone qualitycancellous bonecortical bonemultiaxialmultiscaletrabecular bone

Identifiers

PMID29865872
PMCPMC6053074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.