Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29865871›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2018

Engineering the Mucus Barrier.

T L Carlson, J Y Lock, R L Carrier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Mucinase fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T L CarlsonDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA; email: rebecca@coe.neu.edu.
J Y LockDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
R L CarrierDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA; email: rebecca@coe.neu.edu.

Funding

GuMI: New In Vitro Platforms to Parse the Human Gut Epithelial-Microbiome-Immune AxisR01EB021908 · NIBIB · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI CARRIER, REBECCA L, GRIFFITH, LINDA G · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
Impact of Lipids on Compound Absorption: Mechanistic Studies and ModelingR01GM098117 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI CARRIER, REBECCA L · 2012 to 2021
$3.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021908NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucus selectively controls the transport of molecules, particulate matter, and microorganisms to the underlying epithelial layer. It may be desirable to weaken the mucus barrier to enable effective delivery of drug carriers. Alternatively, the mucus barrier can be strengthened to prevent epithelial interaction with pathogenic microbes or other exogenous materials. The dynamic mucus layer can undergo changes in structure (e.g., pore size) and/or composition (e.g., protein concentrations, mucin glycosylation) in response to stimuli that occur naturally or are purposely administered, thus altering its barrier function. This review outlines mechanisms by which mucus provides a selective barrier and methods to engineer the mucus layer from the perspective of strengthening or weakening its barrier properties. In addition, we discuss strategic design of drug carriers and dosing formulation properties for efficient delivery across the mucus barrier.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLactobacillusMiceMucusNanoparticlesParticle SizePermeabilityProbioticsRatsRheologyStaphylococcus aureusViscosityDrug Carriersmucoadhesive particlesmucolyticmucosal drug deliverymucus barriermucus compositionmucus penetration

Identifiers

PMID29865871
PMCPMC6463277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.