Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29865265›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2018

Antifungal Peptides of the AFP Family Revisited: Are These Cannibal Toxins?

Vera Meyer, Sascha Jung

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The antifungal peptide AnAFP fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Deciphering Molecular Determinants UnderlyingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Emericellipsins A-E from an Alkalophilic FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Changes in the Ultrastructure ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vera MeyerDepartment Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Technische Universität Berlin, Institute of Biotechnology, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, D-13355 Berlin, Germany. vera.meyer@tu-berlin.de.
Sascha JungDepartment Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Technische Universität Berlin, Institute of Biotechnology, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, D-13355 Berlin, Germany. s.jung@tu-berlin.de.
Technische Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence and spread of pathogenic fungi resistant to currently used antifungal drugs represents a serious challenge for medicine and agriculture. The use of smart antimicrobials, so-called "dirty drugs" which affect multiple cellular targets, is one strategy to prevent resistance. Of special interest is the exploitation of the AFP family of antimicrobial peptides, which include its founding member AFP from

Indexed as

AFPAnAFPantifungalantimicrobial peptideAspergillus giganteusAspergillus nigerBacilluscannibal toxinmode of actionsporulation

Identifiers

PMID29865265
PMCPMC6027536
OpenAlexW2807124514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.