Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29865062›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2018

Which Risk Factors Causally Influence Dementia? A Systematic Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies.

Elżbieta Kuźma, Eilis Hannon, Ang Zhou, Ilianna Lourida, Alison Bethel, Deborah A Levine, Katie Lunnon, Jo Thompson-Coon, Elina Hyppönen, David J Llewellyn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Sleep and dementia: Assessing established dementia-related factors using multivariable Mendelian randomization.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Modifiable dementia risk factors associated with objective and subjective cognition.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial intelligence for dementia genetics and omics.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  19. Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elżbieta KuźmaUniversity of Exeter Medical School, UK.
Eilis HannonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, UK.
Ang ZhouCentre for Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Ilianna LouridaUniversity of Exeter Medical School, UK.
Alison BethelNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Deborah A LevineUniversity of Michigan and Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, USA.
Katie LunnonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, UK.
Jo Thompson-CoonNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Elina HyppönenCentre for Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
David J LlewellynUniversity of Exeter Medical School, UK.

Funding

Identifying modifiable aspects of gene-by-environment interplay in later-life cognitive declineRF1AG055654 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FAUL, JESSICA, GALAMA, TITUS JOHANNES · 2017 to 2018
$4.3M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG055654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous risk factors for dementia are well established, though the causal nature of these associations remains unclear.

objectiveTo systematically review Mendelian randomization (MR) studies investigating causal relationships between risk factors and global cognitive function or dementia.

methodsWe searched five databases from inception to February 2017 and conducted citation searches including MR studies investigating the association between any risk factor and global cognitive function, all-cause dementia or dementia subtypes. Two reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts, full-texts, and study quality.

resultsWe included 18 MR studies investigating education, lifestyle factors, cardiovascular factors and related biomarkers, diabetes related and other endocrine factors, and telomere length. Studies were of predominantly good quality, however eight received low ratings for sample size and statistical power. The most convincing causal evidence was found for an association of shorter telomeres with increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Causal evidence was weaker for smoking quantity, vitamin D, homocysteine, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin sensitivity, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Well-replicated associations were not present for most exposures and we cannot fully discount survival and diagnostic bias, or the potential for pleiotropic effects.

conclusionsGenetic evidence supported a causal association between telomere length and AD, whereas limited evidence for other risk factors was largely inconclusive with tentative evidence for smoking quantity, vitamin D, homocysteine, and selected metabolic markers. The lack of stronger evidence for other risk factors may reflect insufficient statistical power. Larger well-designed MR studies would therefore help establish the causal status of these dementia risk factors.

Indexed as

DementiaHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisRisk FactorsAlzheimer’s diseasecognitiondementiainstrumental variableMendelian randomizationrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID29865062
PMCPMC6004893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.