SynthesisPloS one2018
Associations between psychosocial work factors and provider mental well-being in emergency departments: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impacts for health and care workers of Covid-19 and other public health emergencies of international concern: living systematic review, meta-analysis and policy recommendations.Human resources for health · 2024Pooled it
- Organisational-level risk and health-promoting factors within the healthcare sector-a systematic search and review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of effort-reward imbalance prevalence among physicians.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2022Pooled it
- New Burnout Evaluation Model Based on the Brief Burnout Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties for Nursing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- [Adverse moral consequences of overcrowding among emergency department professionals: an explorative survey].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
- Article
- Leading, Connecting and Coping: Nurses' Responses to Sustaining Well-Being During the COVID-19 Crisis-A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- General Health (GHQ-28/CGHQ-28) and Psychosocial Risks (COPSOQ-ISTAS21) in Prehospital Emergency Professionals: A Pre-COVID-19 Cross-Sectional Study in Southern Spain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Acute neurology simulation-based training boosts confidence and reduces anxiety in novice neurology residents and nursing staff.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Evaluating the impact of a participatory organizational intervention on reducing occupational stress in an emergency department setting: a one group pretest-posttest design.BMC public health · 2025Article
- COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Sickness Absences Among Healthcare Workers: A Cohort Study in a Spanish Hospital (2018-2023).La Medicina del lavoro · 2025Article
- Key factors for sustainable working conditions in emergency departments: an EUSEM-initiated, Europe-wide consensus survey.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- Emergency department workforces' experiences and perceptions of well-being from an international perspective: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Latent profiles of nurses' subjective well-being and its association with social support and professional self-concept.Nursing open · 2024Article
- [Indicators to measure the performance of emergency trauma care].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Review
- Best Practices for Technology in Clinical Social Work and Mental Health Professions to Promote Well-being and Prevent Fatigue.Clinical social work journal · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of Hospital-directed Wellness Interventions in COVID-19: A Cross-sectional Survey.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2023Observational
- SOphrology Intervention to Improve WELL-Being in Hospital Staff (SO-WELL): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency departments (ED) are complex and dynamic work environments with various psychosocial work stressors that increase risks for providers' well-being. Yet, no systematic review is available which synthesizes the current research base as well as quantitatively aggregates data on associations between ED work factors and provider well-being outcomes.
objectiveWe aimed at synthesizing the current research base on quantitative associations between psychosocial work factors (classified into patient-/ task-related, organizational, and social factors) and mental well-being of ED providers (classified into positive well-being outcomes, affective symptoms and negative psychological functioning, cognitive-behavioural outcomes, and psychosomatic health complaints).
methodsA systematic literature search in eight databases was conducted in December 2017. Original studies were extracted following a stepwise procedure and predefined inclusion criteria. A standardized assessment of methodological quality and risk of bias was conducted for each study with the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies from the Effective Public Health Practice Project. In addition to a systematic compilation of included studies, frequency and strength of quantitative associations were synthesized by means of harvest plots. Subgroup analyses for ED physicians and nurses were conducted.
resultsN = 1956 records were retrieved. After removal of duplicates, 1473 records were screened for titles and abstracts. 199 studies were eligible for full-text review. Finally, 39 original studies were included whereof 37 reported cross-sectional surveys. Concerning the methodological quality of included studies, the majority was evaluated as weak to moderate with considerable risk of bias. Most frequently surveyed provider outcomes were affective symptoms (e.g., burnout) and positive well-being outcomes (e.g., job satisfaction). 367 univariate associations and 370 multivariate associations were extracted with the majority being weak to moderate. Strong associations were mostly reported for social and organizational work factors.
conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this review is the first to provide a quantitative summary of the research base on associations of psychosocial ED work factors and provider well-being. Conclusive results reveal that peer support, well-designed organizational structures, and employee reward systems balance the negative impact of adverse work factors on ED providers' well-being. This review identifies avenues for future research in this field including methodological advances by using quasi-experimental and prospective designs, representative samples, and adequate confounder control.
trial registrationProtocol registration number: PROSPERO 2016 CRD42016037220.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.