Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29864084›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2018

Stratified Probabilistic Bias Analysis for Body Mass Index-related Exposure Misclassification in Postmenopausal Women.

Hailey R Banack, Andrew Stokes, Matthew P Fox, Kathleen M Hovey, Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano, Erin S LeBlanc, Chloe Bird, Bette J Caan, Candyce H Kroenke, Matthew A Allison and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. BMI-for-age percentile curves for older adults.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Hepatitis C Virus Cure on Depressive Symptoms in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Hepatitis C Virus Coinfected Population in Canada.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Toward a better understanding about real-world evidence.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Common misconceptions about validation studies.International journal of epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of Weight History on the Association Between Directly Measured Adiposity and Mortality in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hailey R BanackFrom the Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, NY.
Andrew StokesDepartment of Global Health and Center for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, MA.
Matthew P FoxDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, MA and Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, MA.
Kathleen M HoveyFrom the Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, NY.
Elizabeth M Cespedes FelicianoDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Erin S LeBlancKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research NW, Portland, OR.
Chloe BirdRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Bette J CaanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Candyce H KroenkeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Matthew A AllisonDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Scott B GoingThe Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Arizona.
Linda SnetselaarCollege of Public Health, University of Iowa, IA.
Ting-Yuan David ChengDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Rowan T ChlebowskiDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Marcia L StefanickDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Michael J LaMonteFrom the Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, NY.
Jean Wactawski-WendeFrom the Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, NY.

Funding

mTOR pathway in breast cancer subtypes by race: A molecular pathological studyK07CA201334 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHENG, TING-YUAN · 2016 to 2020
$693k
CIHRNCI NIH HHS K07 CA201334NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600002CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600003CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600004CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600018C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is widespread concern about the use of body mass index (BMI) to define obesity status in postmenopausal women because it may not accurately represent an individual's true obesity status. The objective of the present study is to examine and adjust for exposure misclassification bias from using an indirect measure of obesity (BMI) compared with a direct measure of obesity (percent body fat).

methodsWe used data from postmenopausal non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white women in the Women's Health Initiative (n=126,459). Within the Women's Health Initiative, a sample of 11,018 women were invited to participate in a sub-study involving dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans. We examined indices of validity comparing BMI-defined obesity (≥30 kg/m), with obesity defined by percent body fat. We then used probabilistic bias analysis models stratified by age and race to explore the effect of exposure misclassification on the obesity-mortality relationship.

resultsValidation analyses highlight that using a BMI cutpoint of 30 kg/m to define obesity in postmenopausal women is associated with poor validity. There were notable differences in sensitivity by age and race. Results from the stratified bias analysis demonstrated that failing to adjust for exposure misclassification bias results in attenuated estimates of the obesity-mortality relationship. For example, in non-Hispanic white women 50-59 years of age, the conventional risk difference was 0.017 (95% confidence interval = 0.01, 0.023) and the bias-adjusted risk difference was 0.035 (95% simulation interval = 0.028, 0.043).

conclusionsThese results demonstrate the importance of using quantitative bias analysis techniques to account for nondifferential exposure misclassification of BMI-defined obesity. See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B385.

Indexed as

BiasBody Mass IndexPostmenopauseAdipose TissueAgedBody HeightBody WeightFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObesityProbability

Identifiers

PMID29864084
PMCPMC6481627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.