Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29864043›Full record

Trial reportThe Clinical journal of pain2018

Periosteal Electrical Dry Needling as an Adjunct to Exercise and Manual Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

James Dunning, Raymond Butts, Ian Young, Firas Mourad, Victoria Galante, Paul Bliton, Michelle Tanner, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Clinical journal of pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02373631 nacompletednot on this map

Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: a Multi-center Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlabama Physical Therapy & AcupunctureRan2015 to 2017Enrolled105ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsDry Needling, Conventional PT, Conventional PT
NCT04295200 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Changes in Muscle Activity, Squat, and Gait Kinematics After Dry Needling Treatment of the Low Back: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center ShreveportRan2019 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsHealthyArmsDry needling with electrical stimulation
NCT04804228 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Efficacy of Electrical Dry Needling Versus Traditional Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Active Myofascial Trigger Points in Pain, Sensitivity, Functionality and Quality of Life of Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AlmeriaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsElectrical dry needling, Ischemic compression, analytical stretching and postural habits educational dossier
NCT05955430 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation Compared to Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Combination With an Education and Exercise Program in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJosue Fernandez CarneroRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsTherapeutic exercise, Pain education, Percutaneous electrical stimulation, Transcutaneous electrical stimulation, Placebo stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

James DunningDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, University King Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
Raymond ButtsAmerican Academy of Manipulative Therapy Fellowship in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy, Montgomery, AL.
Ian YoungAmerican Academy of Manipulative Therapy Fellowship in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy, Montgomery, AL.
Firas MouradDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, University King Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
Victoria GalanteSTI Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Phoenix, AZ.
Paul BlitonOrthopedic Rehab Specialists, Rockford, IL.
Michelle TannerBenchmark Physical Therapy, Atlanta, GA.
César Fernández-de-Las-PeñasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, University King Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESAmerican Academy of Arts and Sciences · USAmerican Physical Therapy Association · USBenchmark Research (United States) · USUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the effects of adding electrical dry needling into a manual therapy (MT) and exercise program on pain, stiffness, function, and disability in individuals with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 242 participants (n=242) with painful knee OA were randomized to receive 6 weeks of electrical dry needling, MT, and exercise (n=121) or MT and exercise (n=121). The primary outcome was related-disability as assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index at 3 months.

resultsIndividuals receiving the combination of electrical dry needling, MT, and exercise experienced significantly greater improvements in related-disability (WOMAC: F=35.504; P<0.001) than those receiving MT and exercise alone at 6 weeks and 3 months. Patients receiving electrical dry needling were 1.7 times more likely to have completely stopped taking medication for their pain at 3 months than individuals receiving MT and exercise (OR, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.01; P=0.001). On the basis of the cutoff score of ≥5 on the global rating of change, significantly (χ=14.887; P<0.001) more patients (n=91, 75%) within the dry needling group achieved a successful outcome compared with the MT and exercise group (n=22, 18%) at 3 months. Effect sizes were large (standardized mean differences >0.82) for all outcome measures in favor of the electrical dry needling group at 3 months. DISCUSSION: The inclusion of electrical dry needling into a MT and exercise program was more effective for improving pain, function, and related-disability than the application of MT and exercise alone in individuals with painful knee OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1b-therapy. Prospectively registered February 10, 2015 on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02373631).

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyAdultAgedCombined Modality TherapyElectric Stimulation TherapyExercise TherapyFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal ManipulationsOsteoarthritis, KneeRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29864043
PMCPMC6250299
OpenAlexW2807187481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.