Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29863958›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

Vaccination knowledge and acceptability among pregnant women in Italy.

Alessia D'Alessandro, Francesco Napolitano, Antonio D'Ambrosio, Italo Francesco Angelillo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Disparities in Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Europe.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women about COVID-19 vaccination.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessia D'Alessandroa Department of Experimental Medicine , University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" , Naples , (Italy).
Francesco Napolitanoa Department of Experimental Medicine , University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" , Naples , (Italy).
Antonio D'Ambrosioa Department of Experimental Medicine , University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" , Naples , (Italy).
Italo Francesco Angelilloa Department of Experimental Medicine , University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" , Naples , (Italy).
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this survey were to ascertain pregnant women's level of knowledge and acceptability on the vaccinations and to identify their associations with several characteristics. A cross-sectional study was performed from December 2017 through March 2018 in the geographic area of Naples, Italy. The study used two stages cluster sampling method for selection and recruitment of participants. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews with pregnant women present at the Obstetrics outpatient clinic of the selected hospitals. A total of 358 respondents agreed to be interviewed out of the 405 pregnant women selected. One-fourth knew at least one of the vaccinations recommended during pregnancy and only 2.8% correctly identified all of these. Women who had received information about the vaccinations during pregnancy from general practitioners or gynecologists or other sources and those with at least one child were more likely to know at least one of the recommended vaccinations, whereas women with middle school education were less knowledgeable. None of the women had received tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine and only 1.4% the seasonal influenza vaccination. Only 27.9% reported a positive willingness to receive all the recommended vaccinations during pregnancy. Pregnant women would be willing to get all recommended vaccinations if they had at least one child and if they needed additional information, whereas the willingness was significantly lower among women who had reported high school as the highest level of education, who were in the second trimester of pregnancy, and who felt that the recommended vaccines administered during pregnancy were less dangerous for them and for the unborn child. This study suggests important focus points to be taking into account for informing and for implementing education activities on the benefits regarding vaccinations in order to increase the level of knowledge and the uptake in pregnant women.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersHealth EducationHospitalsHumansInfluenza VaccinesItalyPregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationYoung AdultInfluenza VaccinesAcceptabilityCross-sectional surveyItalyKnowledgePregnant womenVaccinations

Identifiers

PMID29863958
PMCPMC6067873
OpenAlexW2807084902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.