Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29863610›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesia and analgesia2018

Resuscitation of Endotheliopathy and Bleeding in Thoracic Aortic Dissections: The VIPER-OCTA Randomized Clinical Pilot Trial.

Jakob Stensballe, Annette G Ulrich, Jens C Nilsson, Hanne H Henriksen, Peter S Olsen, Sisse R Ostrowski, Pär I Johansson

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Indications for the Use of Therapeutic Plasma in Adult Patients.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jakob StensballeFrom the Section for Transfusion Medicine, Capital Region Blood Bank, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Annette G UlrichDepartments of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia.
Jens C NilssonDepartments of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia.
Hanne H HenriksenFrom the Section for Transfusion Medicine, Capital Region Blood Bank, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Peter S OlsenCardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Sisse R OstrowskiFrom the Section for Transfusion Medicine, Capital Region Blood Bank, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Pär I JohanssonFrom the Section for Transfusion Medicine, Capital Region Blood Bank, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThoracic aorta dissection is an acute critical condition associated with shock-induced endotheliopathy, coagulopathy, massive bleeding, and significant morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to compare the effect of coagulation support with solvent/detergent-treated pooled plasma (OctaplasLG) versus standard fresh frozen plasma (FFP) on glycocalyx and endothelial injury, bleeding, and transfusion requirements.

methodsInvestigator-initiated, single-center, blinded, randomized clinical pilot trial of adult patients undergoing emergency surgery for thoracic aorta dissection. Patients were randomized to receive OctaplasLG or standard FFP as coagulation factor replacement related to bleeding. The primary outcome was glycocalyx and endothelial injury. Other outcomes included bleeding, transfusions and prohemostatics at 24 hours, organ failure, length of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital, safety, and mortality at 30 and 90 days.

resultsFifty-seven patients were included to obtain 44 evaluable on the primary outcome. The OctaplasLG group displayed significantly reduced damage to the endothelial glycocalyx (syndecan-1) and reduced endothelial tight junction injury (sVE-cadherin) compared to standard FFP. In the OctaplasLG group compared to the standard FFP, days on ventilator (1 day [interquartile range, 0-1] vs 2 days [1-3]; P = .013), bleeding during surgery (2150 [1600-3087] vs 2750 [2130-6875]; P = .046), 24-hour total transfusion and platelet transfusion volume (3975 mL [2640-6828 mL] vs 6220 mL [4210-10,245 mL]; P = .040, and 1400 mL [1050-2625 mL] vs 2450 mL [1400-3500 mL]; P = .027), and goal-directed use of prohemostatics (7/23 [30.4%] vs 13/21 [61.9%]; P = .036) were all significantly lower. Among the 57 patients randomized, 30-day mortality was 20.7% (6/29) in the OctaplasLG group and 25% (7/28) in the standard FFP group (P = .760). No safety concern was raised.

conclusionsIn this randomized, clinical pilot trial of patients undergoing emergency surgery for thoracic aorta dissections, we found that OctaplasLG reduced glycocalyx and endothelial injury, reduced bleeding, transfusions, use of prohemostatics, and time on ventilator after surgery compared to standard FFP. An adequately powered multicenter trial is warranted to confirm the clinical importance of the findings.

Indexed as

Blood CoagulationPlasmaVascular Surgical ProceduresAgedAntigens, CDAortic Aneurysm, ThoracicAortic DissectionAortic RuptureBlood Component TransfusionCadherin 5CadherinsDenmarkEndothelial CellsFemaleGlycocalyxHemorrhageAntigens, CDCadherin 5CadherinsHemostaticsSDC1 protein, humanSyndecan-1

Identifiers

PMID29863610
PMCPMC6135474
OpenAlexW2807540507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.