ArticleInvestigative radiology2018
Clinical Evaluation of a Multiparametric Deep Learning Model for Glioblastoma Segmentation Using Heterogeneous Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data From Clinical Routine.
Article in Investigative radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of machine learning algorithms for glioma segmentation of brain MRI: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Prediction of Post-Infectious Inflammatory Response Syndrome in Patients with Cryptococcal Meningitis Based on Clinical and Radiomics Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Classification of dysphagia severity after lateral medullary infarction with deep learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Review on Deep Learning Methods for Glioma Segmentation, Limitations, and Future Perspectives.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Establishment and evaluation of an automatic multi?sequence MRI segmentation model of primary central nervous system lymphoma based on the nnU?Net deep learning network method.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Marker-controlled watershed algorithm and fuzzy C-means clustering machine learning: automated segmentation of glioblastoma from MRI images in a case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Multi-class glioma segmentation on real-world data with missing MRI sequences: comparison of three deep learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Fully automated segmentation and radiomics feature extraction of hypopharyngeal cancer on MRI using deep learning.European radiology · 2023Article
- Multiparametric MRI: From Simultaneous Rapid Acquisition Methods and Analysis Techniques Using Scoring, Machine Learning, Radiomics, and Deep Learning to the Generation of Novel Metrics.Investigative radiology · 2023Review
- AI-based detection of contrast-enhancing MRI lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Machine learning and deep learning in medicine and neuroimaging.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2023Review
- Generalizable transfer learning of automated tumor segmentation from cervical cancers toward a universal model for uterine malignancies in diffusion-weighted MRI.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the HD-GLIO Deep Learning Algorithm for Brain Tumour Segmentation on Postoperative MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- State-of-the-Art Challenges and Perspectives in Multi-Organ Cancer Diagnosis via Deep Learning-Based Methods.Cancers · 2021Review
- Contrast-Enhanced Black Blood MRI Sequence Is Superior to Conventional T1 Sequence in Automated Detection of Brain Metastases by Convolutional Neural Networks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Automated Meningioma Segmentation in Multiparametric MRI : Comparable Effectiveness of a Deep Learning Model and Manual Segmentation.Clinical neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Semi-Supervised Learning in Medical MRI Segmentation: Brain Tissue with White Matter Hyperintensity Segmentation Using FLAIR MRI.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Review
- Article
- Deep Learning in Large and Multi-Site Structural Brain MR Imaging Datasets.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aims of this study were, first, to evaluate a deep learning-based, automatic glioblastoma (GB) tumor segmentation algorithm on clinical routine data from multiple centers and compare the results to a ground truth, manual expert segmentation, and second, to evaluate the quality of the segmentation results across heterogeneous acquisition protocols of routinely acquired clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations from multiple centers. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe data consisted of preoperative MRI scans (T1, T2, FLAIR, and contrast-enhanced [CE] T1) of 64 patients with an initial diagnosis of primary GB, which were acquired in 15 institutions with varying protocols. All images underwent preprocessing (coregistration, skull stripping, resampling to isotropic resolution, normalization) and were fed into an independently trained deep learning model based on DeepMedic, a multilayer, multiscale convolutional neural network for detection and segmentation of tumor compartments. Automatic segmentation results for the whole tumor, necrosis, and CE tumor were compared with manual segmentations.
resultsWhole tumor and CE tumor compartments were correctly detected in 100% of the cases; necrosis was correctly detected in 91% of the cases. A high segmentation accuracy comparable to interrater variability was achieved for the whole tumor (mean dice similarity coefficient [DSC], 0.86 ± 0.09) and CE tumor (DSC, 0.78 ± 0.15). The DSC for tumor necrosis was 0.62 ± 0.30. We have observed robust segmentation quality over heterogeneous image acquisition protocols, for example, there were no correlations between resolution and segmentation accuracy of the single tumor compartments. Furthermore, no relevant correlation was found between quality of automatic segmentation and volume of interest properties (surface-to-volume ratio and volume).
conclusionsThe proposed approach for automatic segmentation of GB proved to be robust on routine clinical data and showed on all tumor compartments a high automatic detection rate and a high accuracy, comparable to interrater variability. Further work on improvements of the segmentation accuracy for the necrosis compartments should be guided by the evaluation of the clinical relevance.Therefore, we propose this approach as a suitable building block for automatic tumor segmentation to support radiologists or neurosurgeons in the preoperative reading of GB MRI images and characterization of primary GB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.