Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29863383›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2018

Alcohol effects on response inhibition: Variability across tasks and individuals.

Bruce D Bartholow, Kimberly A Fleming, Phillip K Wood, Nelson Cowan, J Scott Saults, Lee Altamirano, Akira Miyake, Jorge Martins, Kenneth J Sher

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acute effect of alcohol on working memory updating.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Relation Between Attention and Memory.Annual review of psychology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bruce D BartholowDepartment of Psychological Sciences.
Kimberly A FlemingDepartment of Psychological Sciences.
Phillip K WoodDepartment of Psychological Sciences.
Nelson CowanDepartment of Psychological Sciences.
J Scott SaultsDepartment of Psychological Sciences.
Lee AltamiranoDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado.
Akira MiyakeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado.
Jorge MartinsDepartment of Psychological Sciences.
Kenneth J SherDepartment of Psychological Sciences.

Funding

PILOT--GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO CONSUMPTION IN CHINESE SAMPLEP50AA011998 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHER, KENNETH JAMES · 1999 to 2008
$12.6M
Psychology of Alcohol Use and Dependence TrainingT32AA013526 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DENIS M MCCARTHY, KENNETH JAMES SHER · 2002 to 2026
$9.0M
Resource CoreP60AA011998 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, PAMELA ANN · 2009 to 2013
$8.8M
Alcohol and Adult Development: Understanding Etiology and ConsequencesK05AA017242 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI SHER, KENNETH JAMES · 2007 to 2016
$2.1M
Incentive Sensitization and Alcohol Sensitivity: Testing a Process ModelF31AA022551 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI FLEMING, KIMBERLY ANN · 2013 to 2014
$68k
Fundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaNIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA022551NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA017242NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA011998NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA011998NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA013526Portuguese Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable research has investigated the acute effects of alcohol on response inhibition, but a number of issues remain unresolved. Given that most studies use only a single laboratory task to assess inhibition, it is often difficult to determine whether alcohol's effects are task specific or generalize across measures of the same construct. Moreover, relatively few studies have directly compared effects of alcohol under ascending and descending blood alcohol concentrations (BACs), and those that have often failed to disentangle BAC limb effects from the effects of repeated testing. This study was intended to provide a test of alcohol's effects on behavioral inhibition using multiple laboratory measures in a relatively large sample and comparing effects under ascending and descending BAC. Young adults (N = 216) completed three commonly used inhibition tasks (Stroop, antisaccade, and stop-signal) at baseline and again 1-3 weeks later under one of three beverage conditions (alcohol, placebo or control) and one of two BAC limb conditions (ascending/descending or descending only). Findings indicated considerable specificity in alcohol's effects. Relative to control and placebo conditions, antisaccade performance suffered under both ascending and descending BAC and stop-signal reaction time (RT) suffered only under descending BAC. The Stroop RT interference effect was not affected by alcohol, though alcohol did impair response accuracy on incongruent Stroop trials. Baseline performance moderated effects of alcohol on both antisaccade accuracy and Stroop interference, suggesting the importance of individual differences. The current findings suggest that more specificity is required in characterizing acute effects of alcohol on inhibitory control. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

IndividualityInhibition, PsychologicalAdultAlcohol DrinkingCognitionEthanolFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceRandom AllocationReaction TimeYoung AdultEthanol

Identifiers

PMID29863383
PMCPMC5991490
OpenAlexW2807056986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.