ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2018
A functional circuit for the retrieval of remote cued fear memory.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural mechanisms of fear memory precision and generalization: from auditory cortex to amygdala.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- The Role of Prefrontal Ensembles in Memory Across Time: Time-Dependent Transformations of Prefrontal Memory Ensembles.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Stabilizing Immature Dendritic Spines in the Auditory Cortex: A Key Mechanism for mTORC1-Mediated Enhancement of Long-Term Fear Memories.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Retrosplenial and Hippocampal Synchrony during Retrieval of Old Memories in Macaques.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Understanding the dynamic and destiny of memories.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Retrosplenial cortex and its role in cue-specific learning and memory.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) is necessary for the retrieval of remotely acquired fear to a discrete auditory cue, it is not necessary for the retrieval of recently acquired cued-fear memories. Thus, the RSC's role in memory retrieval for discrete cues is time-dependent. The purpose of the current experiment was to identify the larger cortical circuit involved in the retrieval of remotely-acquired auditory fear memories. One candidate circuit involves the RSC and secondary auditory cortex; the secondary auditory cortex is also necessary for the retrieval of remotely acquired auditory fear memories (Sacco & Sacchetti, 2010), and sends direct projections to the RSC. To test this possibility, we assessed retrieval of remote memory following functional disconnection of the RSC and secondary auditory cortex. Complete disconnection of these regions produced a larger impairment in fear expression to a remotely acquired auditory cue compared to partial disconnection of these regions. These results are consistent with the notion that RSC and secondary auditory cortex form a functional circuit involved in the retrieval of remotely acquired fear to a discrete auditory cue. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.